My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05388
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05388
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:18:09 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:59:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8449
Description
Platte River Projects
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Date
9/9/1980
Author
USGS
Title
Hydrologic Analysis of the Proposed Badger-Beaver Creeks Artificial-Recharge Project, Morgan County, Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.' <br /> <br />,.---- ---------- <br />_ After adding the region of higher hydraulic conductivity in the area of <br />:the sand dunes and making a few minor adjustments to specific yield, pumping, <br />,and boundary fluxes, the model was run in annual time increments simulating <br />,60 years. The new initial condition was computed and the simulated water- <br />table configuration is shown on figure 25. As indicated in table 11, the sim- <br />'ulated streamflow in Beaver Creek was 20.9 ft3/s. The simulated water table <br />.for 1947 (fig. 26) can be compared to figure 18 and the simulated water table <br />;for 1978 (fig. 27) can be compared to figure 20. The general water budgets <br />for these 2 years are summarized in table 11. Additional substantiation that <br />the model is reasonably calibrated can be seen by the comparisons of the sim- <br />ulated water levels to the measured hydrographs of the six wel Is having at <br />:least 20 years of record (figs. 28-33). Although some of the simulated re- <br />sults are somewhat less than measured water levels, considering the possible <br />range of water levels and the fact that the actual observation wells are not <br />located in the middle of the simulated nodes, the results are not thought to <br />be unreasonable. <br /> <br />Table 11.--Simulated watep budgets fop Beavep Creek valley <br /> <br />computed duping calibration <br /> <br />Pre; rrigation <br /> <br />1947 <br /> <br />1978 <br /> <br />Cubic feet pep second <br /> <br />In flow: <br /> <br />Boundary flux------- <br /> <br />23.1 <br /> <br />23.1 <br /> <br />23.1 <br /> <br />Outflow: <br /> <br />Pumping------------- <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />20.8 <br /> <br />24.0 <br /> <br />Streamflow---------- <br /> <br />20.9 <br /> <br />9.9 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Boundary flux------- <br /> <br />2.2 <br /> <br />2.2 <br /> <br />2.2 <br /> <br />Change in storage----- <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />-9.8 <br /> <br />-3.1 <br /> <br />.: <br /> <br />~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.