My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05388
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05388
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:18:09 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:59:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8449
Description
Platte River Projects
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Date
9/9/1980
Author
USGS
Title
Hydrologic Analysis of the Proposed Badger-Beaver Creeks Artificial-Recharge Project, Morgan County, Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.!' I <br />._-~ <br />! <br /> <br />A limited amount of pumping data is avai lable, mostly for the Beaver' <br />,Creek valley. Published pumping data for Beaver Creek valley collated from: <br />various sources is presented in table 10. The pumping rates from year to year~ <br />were quite erratic. A change in precipitation was hypothesized to be a, <br />reasonable indicator for variable rates of application. Data for the 6 years: <br />available were plotted versus the annual precipitation for the same year, <br />resulting in the relationship shown in figure 22. A regression analysis of, <br />this data resulted in the equation: i <br /> <br />Ap <br />P <br />a <br /> <br />A =2.66-0.093P , <br />P a <br />is the application rate, in feet per year; <br /> <br />is the annual precipitation, in inches. <br /> <br />(15J <br /> <br />where <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />The equation computes a reasonable estimate of 1.43 ft per year for the aver- <br />age application rate when using the average annual precipitation of 13.2 in. <br /> <br />Table 10.--HistoT'ie pwnping data [01' Beaver> Cr>eek valley <br /> <br />Year <br /> <br />Number <br />of <br />wells <br /> <br />Pumpage <br />(acre-feet) <br /> <br />Irrigated <br />acres <br /> <br />Appl icat ion <br />rate <br />(feet) <br /> <br />Precipitation: <br />(i nches) <br /> <br />19101.- Firs t "'e 11 s ------ ------ <br />19361.- 25 ------ ------ <br />19401-- 53 7,710 4,920 1. 57 11. 12 <br />19462-- 109 11,445 10,191 1. 12 17.42 <br />19472-- 117 12,084 10,939 1. 10 13.76 <br />19482-- 121 17,889 11,313 1.58 12.57 <br />19492-- 135 17,018 12,623 1.35 15.10 <br />19502-- 138 24,343 12,903 1.89 9.45 <br />19723_- ------ 16,500 <br />lCode, 1943. <br />2Bjorklund and Brown, 1957. <br />3Computed from U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1972. <br /> <br />If there were no precipitation, irrigation applications would have to: <br />total the crop consumptive use. This equation results in a reasonable esti-, <br />mate of 2.66 ft per year for crop consumptive use if there were no precipita-' <br />'tion. Cumulative irrigated acreage and an implied increase in pumping are' <br />shown in figure 23. These data were obtained from a list of well permits on: <br />'file "lith the Conservancy District (Thomas Norton, written commun., 1978).' <br />'By estimating the land irrigated by each well and tabulating the date of, <br />'drilling, the area of irrigated land was computed. This curve has limitations: <br />:in accuracy because many wells were constructed as replacement wells as ",ater <br />:levels declined. Thus the curve does not include the effects of cessation of, <br />'pump i ng rep 1 aced ",e II s. <br />I <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />.!!3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.