Laserfiche WebLink
<br />------ ----- <br />, <br /> <br />Table 8.--Swnmary of distribution-model results <br />for five canal-layout alternatives <br />with 20-percent probability river diversions <br /> <br />- <br /> Beneficial Pond Duration Maximum monthly <br /> Al ternat ive seepage seepage of ponds total pond <br /> (cubic feet (cubic feet (months) surface area <br /> per second) per second) (acres) <br />En tire canal system <br /> \"i th 65 ponds-------- 239 206 10 1,203 <br />, - <br />Beaver Creek valley <br /> only----------------- 241 214 11 1,257 <br />Badger Creek valley <br /> only----------------- 237 233 10 1,109 <br />Recharge cana 1 s only--- 240 232 10 1,292 <br />Recharge cana I s plus <br /> extension------------ 240 228 10 1,278 <br /> <br />To compare the results from the simulations using river diversions of <br />certain probabilities (20 percent and 50 percent have been shown), one final <br />simulation was made with 27 years of historically developed data. The river: <br />diversions for this simulation are the estimated monthly divertible flows for' <br />1947 through 1974. These are the same storable flows used to compute the <br />'frequencies shown in table 2, limited when necessary by the capacity of Bijou <br />Canal. An annual summary of the model results by water years is presented in <br />table 9. Although not listed in this table, the historical diversions <br />compare quite closely and would be sl ightly larger than the total seepage <br />sho.:n in table 9. Of particular interest relative to the potential waterfo\"l <br />habitat is the pond acreage during April. The frequency curve for the pond <br />surface area during April for the 27-year period is shown in figure 13. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />l_ <br /> <br />2.9- <br /> <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />I, <br />I <br />