Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r--------.----- ------ <br />, Another set of simulations was made with the larger river diversions ofi <br />20-percent probabil ity (table 2). Example model results for the same canal-: <br />layout alternative as used to create table 5 are shown in table 7. The sum-, <br />mary of five of the canal-layout alternatives for the larger river diversions: <br />'is shown in table 8. The monthly distribution of the total pond surface area: <br />fgr three of these alternatives is shown in figure 12. <br /> <br />Table 7. --Distribution-model results foT' entiT'e proposed canal system <br /> with 65 ponds and 20-peT'cent pT'obability riveT' diveT'sions <br /> Diversion Total Beneficial Pond Total pond; <br />110nth i nf low seepage seepage seepage surface <br /> (cubic feet (cubic feet (cubic feet (cubic feet area <br /> per second) per second) per second) per second) (acres) <br />October-u-- 149 138.60 84.44 43.13 182 <br />November---- 141 146.55 93.11 51. 78 215 <br />Decemberu-- 265 230.10 166.71 124.54 460 <br />January-u-- 500 442.61 364.15 319.39 1,015 <br />F eb r ua ry u u 500 514.62 436.16 391.39 1,203 <br />l1arch----n- 500 487.71 409.25 364.49 1,138 <br />April------- 500 493.79 415.33 370.56 1,152 <br />l1ay--------- 500 490.85 412.39 367.62 1,145 <br />June-------- 500 491.03 412.57 367.81 1,145 <br />July-------- 0 75.57 75.57 75.57 431 <br />August---n- 0 0 0 0 0 <br />September--- 0 0 0 0 0 <br />Average--- 296 293 239 206 674 <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />; <br />!..., <br />I <br /> <br />i, <br /> <br />27 <br />