Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'I <br /> <br />I, <br /> <br />A summary of six model simulations comparing different geographical lay-' <br />'outs of the proposed canal system is presented in table 6. The alternative' <br />'''Recharge canals only" assumed that no water would be released to the chan-, <br />;nels of Badger and Beaver Creeks and only those canals which are planned to' <br />:go through the sand hi I Is vlOuld be constructed. The alternative "Recharge' <br />:canals plus extension" assumed that the canal leading to Buck Creek in Beaver: <br />:Creek valley also would be constructed. From the viewpoint of beneficial, <br />'seepage, none of the alternatives has any distinct advantage over another. <br />Pond surface area can be increased by el iminating diversions to the creek <br />channels if this situation creates a better wildlife environment. The monthly <br />,distribution of the total pond surface area for four canal-layout alterna- <br />tives is shown in figure 11. <br /> <br />Table 6.--Svnwary of distribution-model results <br />for six canal-layout alternatives <br />with 50-percent probability rivep diversions <br /> <br />Al ternative <br /> <br />Beneficial <br />seepage <br />(cubic feet <br />per second) <br /> <br />Pond <br />seepage <br />(cubic feet <br />per second) <br /> <br />Durat ion <br />of ponds <br />(months) <br /> <br />Haximum monthly <br />total pond <br />surface area <br />(acres) <br /> <br /> En tire canal system <br /> wi th 7 ponds---------- 28.6 11.2 6 201 <br /> Ent ire canal system <br /> wi th 65 ponds--------- 28.6 11.2 5 304 <br />'Beaver Creek valley only <br />; (53 ponds)------------ 28.5 14.7 6 339 <br />i <br />;Badger Creek valley only <br /> (22 ponds)------------ 28.4 23.3 6 345 <br />I <br />i <br /> Recha rge canals only <br /> (65 ponds)------------ 28.2 23.7 6 400 <br />I <br />I <br />'Recharge canals plus <br /> extension (65 ponds)-- 28.4 22.2 6 392 <br /> <br />I" <br />I <br /> <br />22. <br />