Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I Table 4.--Distribution-modeZ results for VaI'ious river> divel'sions <br />, <br />I <br /> and no ponds <br />I <br />~ River Seepage from Seepage from Total Excess <br /> sect ion 1 Trave 1- outflow <br />:aiversion see t ion 11 (cubic feet seepage time (cubic feet <br />(cubic feet (cubic feet per second (cubic feet' (days) per second) : <br />,per second) per second) per mile) per second) <br /> 10 10 (2) 10 31.8 0 <br /> 25 25 (2) 25 33.1 0 <br /> 50 43 0.9 50 36.2 0 <br /> 100 49 1.0 91 11.2 9 <br /> 150 54 1.1 97 10.4 53 <br /> 200 58 1.2 102 10.0 98 <br /> 300 66 1.4 111 9.6 189 <br /> 400 72 1.5 119 9.4 281 <br /> 500 78 1.7 126 9.2 374 <br /> <br />ISee figure 7 for location. <br />2Length is unknown because water "did not reach the end of section 1. <br />3Flow did not get through the entire system. <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />Combining the results of the average surface area per pond (fig. 8) and: <br />the available supply for pond diversion (fig. 9) yields the total pond; <br />'surface area that could be maintained from a given river diversion (fig. 10).' <br />'These relationships were computed by dividing the potential supply to ponds' <br />'(equation 14) by the average inflow to the ponds in order to obtain the num-, <br />ber of ponds. The total surface area is computed by multiplying the number <br />'of ponds times the average pond surface area (fig. 8). The total number of <br />'ponds in the model was limited to 75, and, thus, the curves in figure 10 have, <br />jl imits on the left side of the graph. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2..1 <br /> <br />.--- --., <br />;, <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />~ <br />I <br />