Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.-- ----------- <br /> <br />,---" <br />, In a filing in the District Court in and for Water Division No.1, State: <br />:of Colorado, the conservancy district has requested a water right of! <br />, <br />240,000 acre-ft annually to be made senior in right to fil ing 366 for the, <br />proposed Narrows Reservoir and also has asked for an alternative point of! <br />diversion for the 355.025 ft3/s decreed rights of existing wel Is to the, <br />headgate of Bijou Ditch. On the basis of these water-right filings and thei <br />typical flows in the South Platte River, the conservancy district proposes to: <br />divert about 90,000 acre-ft per year into the canal system. <br /> <br />Purpose and Scope <br /> <br />In February 1978, the U.S. Fish and Wildl ife Service entered into a Mem-' <br />orandum of Agreement with the Badger and Beaver Water Conservancy District.' <br />Under the terms of this agreement, the U.S. Fish and Wildl ife Service would <br />finance a hydrologic analysis of the proposed project because of the poten- <br />tial benefits to wildlife that could accrue through development of wetlands <br />from ground-water augmentation projects. It was believed that artificial <br />recharge could become widely used in the South Platte River basin of north- <br />eastern Colorado. The U.S. Fish and Wildl ife Service determined that through <br />this study it would gain a better understanding about the direct and indirect <br />impacts of artificial recharge on fish and wildl ife. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />In March 1978, the U.S. Fish and Hildlife Service agreed to fund an 18- <br />month study to be conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey of the hydrologic <br />aspects of the proposed artificial-recharge project. The study had four pri- <br />mary objectives: (1) The availability of water for diversion from the South <br />Platte River; (2) the del ivery and recharge of the diverted water; (3) the <br />effects of the artificial recharge on the ground-water system; and (4) the <br />total hydrologic impact of the proposed project on the South Platte River <br />basin. The study was to consider only the general hydrologic as?ects of the <br />proposed project and was not intended to consider any site-specific hydraulic <br />conditions, engineering-design problems, or economic considerations. <br />I <br /> <br />" <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />At the request of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, a meeting was heldl <br />on March 16, 1979, at which the U.S. Geological Survey presented preliminary: <br />results of the study to representatives of the U.S. Fish and Hildlife Service' <br />and the Badger and Beaver Water Conservancy District. On May 23, 1979, the: <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service notified the Badger and Beaver Hater: <br />Conservancy District that it could not participate in the wildlife-management' <br />part of the recharge plan because preliminary results of the study indicated' <br />that the project would significantly deplete flows in the South Platte River.: <br />According to the U.S, Fish and Wildlife Service, such depletion could have: <br />adverse effects on habitat for whooping cranes or other migratory birds along! <br />'the Platte River in Nebraska. However, all parties agreed that the results: <br />of the study should be published. ! <br />i I <br /> <br />L i <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />of:- <br /> <br />5 <br />