Laserfiche WebLink
<br />; J ' <br /> <br />.------------- <br /> <br />in 1939." Pumping continued to increase, according to Bjorklund and Brown <br />{1957), who reported that 109 wells were pumped in 19~6 and 138 wells were <br />pumped in 1950. The increased pumping began creating drawdown problems as <br />early as 1950. Bjorklund und Bro"1n (1957, p. 50) reported, "The decline of <br />'the water table is more critical in the Beaver Creek valley than in any other: <br />part of the South Platte River valley project area. . ." Pumping apparently <br />continued to increase unti I dra",dO\"ns caused abandonment of numerous wells <br />and withdrawal of land from irrigation. <br /> <br />Proposed Artificial-Recharge Project <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />In April 1976, the Badger and Beaver Water Conservancy District was <br />formed under the provisions of Article 45, Title 37, Colorado Revised Stat- <br />utes, 1973. The purpose of this conservancy district was to promote a proj- <br />ect to artificially recharge the two alluvial aquifers in an attempt to again <br />achieve the historical pumping rates and return lands to their previous ir-' <br />rigated conditions. Although nO formal engineering designs have been devel- <br />oped, a preliminary plan has been developed. According to the plan, water <br />would be diverted from the South Platte River at the headgate of the existing <br />Bijou Canal just west of Canton, Colo., in Weld County (fig. 2). Water would <br />flO\., through the Bijou Canal to about the mouth of San Arroyo Creek south of' <br />Griffin, Colo., in ~Iorgan County, where it ,"ould be diverted into a ne\'1 canal <br />to be constructed. This new canal would cross the channel of Badger Creek at <br />about the sect ion I ine between Tps. 1 and 2 IL, R. 57 W., where some "'ater <br />,.,ould be released down the channel of .Badger Creek. About 2.5 mi downstream, <br />water in Badger Creek would be diverted to another canal to be constructed <br />east of the creek. This canal would trend northward along the edge of the <br />sand hi lIs and terminate about 2 mi north of the section line between Tps. 2 <br />and 3 N., R. 57 W. <br /> <br />Water not diverted into Badger Creek would be pumped into a lined canal <br />,leading to the channel of Beaver Creek near the southern Horgan County line, <br />~here the ",ater would be released into the channel of Beaver Creek. About <br />:1 Jili dO\-lnstream, part of the ,"ater \-,ould be diverted into a new canal to be <br />constructed west of the creek. This canal would trend northward through the <br />sand hills and terminate about 2.5 mi south of Brush (fig. 2). 'In addition,' <br />another canal may be constructed to carry water farther east where it could <br />be released to the channels of Buck Creek and an unnamed draw (fig. 2). <br /> <br />It is also proposed to create numerous ponds throughout this recharge-' <br />distribution system by either instal ling check dams along the canals and, <br />channels or by creating turnouts to the many natural depressions, particu-: <br />:Iarly in the sand hills. These proposed ponds primarily would enhance the; <br />, <br />environment relative to wildl ife and waterfowl. Water would seep from the <br />canals, stream channels, and ponds, and infiltrate the underlying aquifers.: <br />"he desired result of this infiltration would be to recharge the aquifers: <br />~ufficiently to accommodate increased ground-water pumping during the irriga-: <br />,tion season. I <br />I I <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />2... <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />