Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3443 <br /> <br />A major social issue in the valley is the additional transfer of water from the valley. <br />Residents of the area recognize the inherent right of water owners to sell these water rights to <br />the highest bidder. On the other hand, people expect that additional water transfers seriously <br />threaten their agricultural way of life and the quality of life in the valley. <br /> <br />THE POTENTIAL SOCIAL IMPACfS OF ADDffiONAL WATER TRANSFERS <br /> <br />A review of the literature revealed that very little work of a purely sociological nature has <br />been done on the subject of water transfers. Our visits and interviews in the study area revealed <br />that many of the social factors reported in the literature are present in the valley. The potential <br />for transfer of the Fort Lyon Canal water already has produced some tension and anxiety. Weber <br />reports (d, 26) that the depressed economic condition of Arkansas Valley farms makes the selling <br />of water shares both necessary and desirable for many farmers. <br /> <br />Other writers have touched upon the social conflicts that emerge from the economics of <br />transfers. Shupe, et al. (1989, 428) found large transfers of water from rural to urban areas <br />typically cause controversy in the area where the water rights originate. But Weber argues that <br />"controversy' is too mild a term for describing local feelings and refers to times when farmers felt <br />obliged to carry firearms with them as they went out to irrigate (Weber 1990b, 13). He points <br />to the frustration, anxiety and tension which are present in those who chose not to sell. When <br />such conflict between neighbors is present communities which took pride in their neighborliness, <br />cooperation, and kinship ties become increasingly polarized (Weber 1990b, 14). <br /> <br />Results of limited interviews in the valley, a recent sample survey (Fulton, et al. 1992), and <br />the knowledge of the study team members indicate that many of these same concerns exist in the <br />study area. These concerns already influence social interactions in a significant way and are <br />therefore an important part of the sociological profile and forecast for the study area. <br /> <br />WATER DEMAND <br /> <br />There are no known current municipal requirements for additional water supply in the <br />upper basin. At this time, no municipal growth demands in the study area are anticipated based <br />on projections; however, augmentation of existing wells may be required. Additionally, local <br />economic development officials have expressed a desire to develop an additional industrial base <br />which may require new sources of high quality municipal water supplies. For estimating purposes, <br />5000 af C.U. may be set aside as an economic development pool to encourage growth. Table 2 <br />presents a summary of possible maximum local demands and valuation estimates. By way of <br />comparison, value of Fort Lyon water may be about $720/share or $600 af C.U., based upon <br />recent sales data on farm transactions within the FLCC irrigated acreage. <br />