Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />',r',' ""'~I/ , rom:=,. ~l= fl\ <br />" b.'I,- [~~=. ' \ <br />_ tlL[[\\J[O /. L;;:~...~~t~ " ~\ii <br />344 \J C::' \\ j'/ \ r- il,i; I, 'II <br />- ,"V' ,;Ii ~I I ' <br />(1"'lt~t~ ,'"" ~,Lf k <br />[::~ j\'" l;i Ie, i ' ~"'___""'';:;;'';;~') <br />/ /7 .~,_." ~. ~ ~~, <br />" . , , --r:i> <br />ALTERNATIVES T :, ~ LARGE-SCALE AGRICULTURAL WATER TRANSFER' <br /> <br />John R. Clark Ph.D., P.E! <br /> <br />ABSTRACT: The paper presents the results of a multi-disciplinary study of a possible large-scale <br />water transfer out of the Fort Lyon Canal Company (FLCC) in southeastern Colorado. The <br />study, funded in 1992 by the Colorado General Assembly at the request of the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board (CWCB), estimates the effects of this water transfer on the FLCC and the <br />surrounding communities and identifies alternatives to a permanent out-of-basin transfer. <br /> <br />The FLCC is the largest irrigation company in the Arkansas River Basin of Colorado, <br />serving 92,600 acres and diverting an average of 211,600 acre feet (at) annually. The <br />socioeconomic, hydrologic and environmental effects of such a transfer are addressed. Relevant <br />historic water transfers in the area are discussed for perspective. Three alternatives to sale and <br />transfer out of the valley, from the perspective of the FLCC shareholders, are described: <br />1) increase internal transfers through bylaw changes and company investment in new <br />facilities; 2) regional temporary and permanent transfers within the lower valley by lease and sale, <br />using water banking and land fallowing; and 3) dry-year temporary transfers, using water option <br />agreements between FLCC shareholders and Front Range water users, such as Metropolitan <br />Denver water utilities. <br />KEY TERMS: Water transfers, water marketing, water banking, impact assessment. <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The Fort Lyon Canal Company (FLCe) is the largest irrigation company on the Arkansas <br />River of Colorado, providing water to approximately 92,600 acres. The FLCCwater rights date <br />back to 1884. The company diverts an average of 211,600 acre feet (at) of surface water per year, <br />based upon the records from 1950 to 1985. Direct diversions range to 933 cfs,plus additional <br />diversions under various contracts and about 250 supplemental wells. The main canal stretches <br />over 100 miles and has 365 headgates. The FLCC also has several reservoirs, totaling about <br />110,000 af of storage. The company is managed in five operating divisions, with one <br />superintendent and a five-member Board of Directors <br /> <br />In December 1991, Colorado Water Supply Company (CWS), submitted an offer to <br />shareholders of the FLCC for the purchase of their shares. CWS desired to purchase at least a <br /> <br />1 Presented at the Annual Summer Symposium, American Water Resources Association, <br />Effects of Human- Induced Changes on Hvdrologic Svstems, Competition Between Users; Jackson <br />Hole, Wyoming, June 26-29, 1994. <br /> <br />2 Project Manager and Study Team Leader, Gronning Engineering Company, Denver, <br />Colorado. <br />