My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05313
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05313
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:49 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:57:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.766
Description
Gunnison River General
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
3/1/1991
Author
BLM
Title
Gunnison Resource Area - Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement - Draft - Beginning to Chapter 3
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CHAPTER ONE <br /> <br />Table 1-2 <br /> <br />PLANNING ISSUES AND CRITERIA <br /> <br />ISSUE <br /> <br />PLANNING CRITERIA <br /> <br />1. How shouJd cxWing livestock and other <br />uses be managed in riparian areas for <br />protection Bnd enhancement of riparian <br />values? <br /> <br />2. What management should occur to <br />maintain or impl'OYC forage conditions in <br />allotments not covered by current <br />Allotment Management Plans (AMPs) or <br />outdated management plans? <br /> <br />A. Comply with all public land laws. <br />B. Consider impacts to watershed conditions (upland, riparian, channels), watershed <br />vuJncmbility. and watershed responsiveness. <br />C. Maintain erosion condition class of slight/moderate as described in Montrose <br />District Office Soil Erosion Monitoring Program. <br />D. Comply with criteria Cor minimum acceptable vegetation and 'Watershed conditions <br />that must be met through management activities. <br />B. Consider changing livestock numbers, livestock classes, seasons of use, and <br />distribution of livestock to improve plant vigor and frequency. <br />F. Consider use of vegetative treatments to increase plant basal c~r and perennial <br />plant species. <br /> <br />3. How and where should. sagebrush <br />community types be managed for wildlife <br />and livelitOCk.? <br /> <br />A. Comply with all public land laws. <br />B. Consider impacts to v.ratersbed cond.itions (upland, riparian, channels), watershed <br />vulnerability, and watershed responsiveness. <br />C. Maintain erosion condition class of slightlmodenHe as described in Montrose <br />District Office Soil Erosion Monitoring Program. <br />D. Comply with criteria {or minimum acceptable vegetation and watershed conditioRli <br />that must be met through management activities. <br />E. Consider providing for the maintenance of a heallhy viable breeding population <br />of elk and deer. <br />F. Provide sagebrosh habitat to maintain the cx.istjng Sage Grouse population in the <br />Razor Creek drainage, North and South Parlin Plats, and Chance Gulch area; consider <br />providing li8.gebrush habitat to increase the Sage Grouse populations where feasibJe. <br />G. Consider managing the sagebrush communities for ecological site potential or <br />increased production of wildlife habitat or livestock forage. <br /> <br />4. In view of the importance of recreation <br />and tourism for local economiea:. what <br />steps can be taken to improve recreation <br />divenity and opportunities, while <br />p.re&erving the resources necessary for <br />desirable recreation settin~1 <br /> <br />A. Comply with all public land laws. <br />B. Consider public lands in extensive recreation areas needing special management <br />for development or protection of recreation resources. <br />C. Conliider needed changes to current off-highway vehicle designations. <br />D. Consider measures to maintain or reduce resource impacts caused by recreation <br />activities and improve recreation management in the Resource Acea, especially in the <br />Lake Fork and Powderhom areas. <br />E. Consider measures to improve the quality and availability of public recreation <br />resources where possible. <br />P. Identify problems occurring to recreation and tourism caused by other land uses <br />and recommend possible solutions. <br /> <br />1.6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.