Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,F] " ., .; ) <br />rJ' :"':._ <.J ., <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />This Draft Resource Management Plan and <br />Environmental Impact Statement (RMPIEIS) <br />identifies and analyzes the options for management of <br />the public lands for the next 10-12 years in the <br />Gunnison planning area in the Gunnison Resource <br />Area in west-central Colorado. The planning area <br />encompasses a total of approximately 960,730 acres in <br />the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) Montrose <br />District. The BLM has administrative responsibility <br />for the public lands and resources on 585,012 surface <br />acres and 728,600 acres of mineral estate within tbe <br />planning area. <br /> <br />This resource management plan is being prepared <br />lISing the BLM's planning regulations issued under the <br />authority of the Federal Land Policy and Management <br />Act of 1976. <br /> <br />ISSUE IDENTIFICATION <br /> <br />The planning process for this RMP lEIS began in <br />September 1988, with issue identification, Public <br />meetings to determine the scope of tbe document and <br />to identify public concerns that should be addressed <br />were beld in Gunnison, Lake City, and Montrose, <br />Colorado. Written comments were also solicited. <br />The issues identified by the public and the BLM <br />during this initial scoping process, and which are <br />addressed in the RMP, are detailed in Table 1-2. <br /> <br />MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />Five multiple-lISe alternatives were developed in this <br />RMPIEIS. Under Alternative A, Continuation of <br />Current Management, multiple use management <br />would continue in much the same manner as currently <br />exists, using available inventory data, existing activity <br />or project plans for a variety of resource programs, <br />existing planning or environmental documents, and <br />established land use allocations. In Alternative B, <br /> <br />management of resources would focllS on developing <br />and maintaining recreational opportunities that <br />increase tourism and promote economic stability and <br />quality of life within the planning area. Under <br />Alternative C, objectives call for a high degree of <br />production and economic return of 'commodity" <br />oriented resources. In Alternative D, a high degree <br />of protection, enhancement, and maintenance of <br />natural values, over and above that required by <br />protective laws or policy is called for. Alternative E, <br />the Preferred Alternative, balances competing <br />demands by providing products and services while <br />protecting important and sensitive environmental <br />issues. Each alternative proposes different solutions <br />to the identified issues and describes the different <br />management options available to the BLM for the <br />planning area. Each of the alternatives is a complete, <br />reasonable, and implementable plan which provides a <br />framework for public land management and resource <br />allocation specific to the alternative's management <br />objectives. <br /> <br />Initially four alternatives were analyzed. They are <br />Alternatives A (Continuation of Current Management <br />Alternative), B, C, and D. Each alternative was <br />described, and the potential impacts of its <br />management on the environment were analyzed. <br />Based on this analysis, the BLM's policy and goals, <br />and the varying levels of responsiveness to the issues <br />identified during the scoping process, Alternative E, <br />the Preferred Alternative, was developed and its <br />environmental consequences were identified. <br /> <br />The alternatives are described in Chapter Three and <br />the anticipated environmental consequences of each <br />alternative are described in Chapter Four. Table S-1 <br />summarizes the key points of each alternative. <br /> <br />S-1 <br />