Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />11.\ h'OLI' I;:. 1':",- H 1(' H <br />CONSUL TINe; ENGINEER <br />DENVER 19.COLORADO <br /> <br />P\jONE WEsr 4-1465 <br />1660 SO. KING STREET <br /> <br />In order to determine the actual quantities of seepage, the per <br />centage of siltation was taken to be proportional to the per cent- <br />age of total in-flow water developed from month to month and it was <br />further assumed that the total losses to the well field and total <br />seepage losses would be on the left side of the reservoir, the right <br />side being known to be located against comparatively impervious pre- <br />consolidated bedrock substances. <br /> <br />The total initial losses that would occur during the ini- <br />tial flood stage would amount to 1020 acre-feet of water. This fig- <br />ure reduces rapidly after initial filling butt during the first year <br />of operation, it would be logical to expect 4,45 acre-feet of water <br />lost into the well field feeding the water supply for the city of <br />Lamarr Colorado. During the second year, this figure reduces rapidly <br />from 32 acre-feet during the month of May to a figure of less than <br />one acre-foot of water during the month of August. A total of 166 <br />acre-feet of water was the assumed loss during the second year of <br />operation. <br /> <br />Three approximate reservoir operation studies were conducted <br />on the basis of the above assumptions and developed around the aver- <br />age annual precipitation rates with high, medium and low recorded <br />evaporation losses. In all cases, complete development of the reser- <br />voir will require the development time of siltation to extend into the <br />second year of operation. Considering a high evaporation year, the <br />water level would be drawn down to a maximum of plus 22 feet over the <br />creekbed, or a total draw down of 10 feet during the first year's op- <br />eration during the month of March. Assumming the medium evaporation <br />year, the draw down would be approximately 8 feet during the month of <br />14arch, and during a low evaporation year, approximately 7 feet during <br />the month of March. After the first year's operation, I do not an- <br />ticipate high seepage losses to continue. <br /> <br />The above operational study Was conducted on an approximate <br />basis in that the evaporation losses were not corrected for the reduc- <br />tion in the reservoir surface due to prior depletion nor was the effect <br />of the decrease in area included insofar as seepage factors will be <br />concerned. It would be logical to assume that, under any initial <br />yearly operat1oD1 spawning would not occur within this basin; however <br />the survival fac~or for fish stocked in this area would be satisfac- ' <br />tory during even extremely low years of annual precipitation and high <br />evaporation, <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />L___ <br /> <br />- 3 - <br /> <br />k,- -,.<_, <br />