|
<br />I. "
<br />
<br />. ,
<br />
<br />1982), pp. 215-23; Comment, "Water Law - Legal Impediments to Transfers
<br />
<br />of Water Rights," Natural Resources Journal, Vol. 7 (19071, p. 4]].
<br />
<br />o. Joseph Sax, "Selling Reclamation Water Rights: A Case Study in Federal
<br />
<br />Subsidy Policy," MichiF;an Law Review, Vol. 64 (1965), p. 13; willis
<br />Ellis & Charles Du Mars, "The Two-Tiered Market in Western Water,"
<br />
<br />Nebraska Law Review, Vol. 57 (197B), p. 333; George Pringle & Laurence
<br />
<br />Edelman, "Reclamation Law Constraints on Energy/industrial Uses of
<br />
<br />Western Water.,.. Natural Resources Lawyer, Vol. 8 (1976), p. 297.
<br />
<br />7. Comment, "Reclamation.Subsidies and Their Present-Day Impact," Arizona
<br />
<br />State Law Journal (!98U), pp. 497, 518-2U; Comment, "Desert Survival:
<br />
<br />The Evolving Western Irrigation District," Arizona State Law Journal
<br />
<br />(1982), pp. 377, 387-89.
<br />
<br />8. Ibid.; H. S. Burness, R. G. Cummings, W. D. Gorman and R. R. Lansford,
<br />
<br />"United States Reclamation Policy and Indian Water Rights," Natural
<br />
<br />Resources Journal, Vol. 20 (1980), p. 807; Paul E. Roberts, "Benefit-
<br />
<br />Cost Analysis: Its Use (Misuse) in Evaluating Water Resource Projects,"
<br />
<br />American Business Law Journal (1976), pp. 73, 81-83.
<br />
<br />9. Roberts, ~ cit., p. 74; A. B. Jaffe, "Benefit-Cost Analysis and
<br />
<br />Multi-Objective Evaluation of Federal Water Projects," Harvard Environ-
<br />
<br />mental Law Review, Vol. 4 (1980), pp. 58, 60, 61; Richard L. Berkman &
<br />
<br />W. Kip Viscusi, Damming the West (New York, New York: Grossman Publish-
<br />
<br />ers, 197]), pp. 55-02.
<br />
<br />- ]2 -
<br />
|