My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05306
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05306
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:46 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:57:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.700
Description
Colorado River
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/3000
Author
Getches and Meyers
Title
The River of Controversy - Persistent Issues
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />< . <br /> <br />One has never had a right to waste water under the prior appropriation <br /> <br />system; the right is only to put water to 0 "heneficial use. <br /> <br />And definitions <br /> <br />of waste and beneficial use are relative.95 A recent trend in the West is to <br /> <br />redefine beneficial use in light of today's technology and conditions. Thus, <br /> <br />a leaky, unlined irrigation ditch that was the state of the art 75 years ago <br />96 <br />may be found wasteful today. Water lost by the ditch might be counted <br />97 <br />against one's right to use water. Judicial decisions and legislation can <br /> <br />penalize waste from antiquated irrigation and storage works, poor water use <br /> <br />~ractices, phreatophytes, and the like, and can reward salvage in a variety of <br /> <br />ways. <br /> <br />Millions of acre-feet of water might be saved in the basin states through <br />Yl:l <br />conservative agricultural water use practices. But there are impediments to <br /> <br />conservation, some of which are inherent in the law of the river. The guaran- <br /> <br />teed annual flow formula ~rovides a disincentive to conserve in the Upper <br /> <br />Basin states when the first call on surpluses belongs to the Lower Basin. <br /> <br />Consequently, Upper Basin states are moved to <br /> <br />search for new uses of water to <br />i <br />Andjwer Bain states <br /> <br />t~t costs;rS little to <br /> <br />have <br /> <br />prevent it from being "lost" to downstream users. <br /> <br />had lir'tle incentiv~to limit their uses of water <br /> <br />obtayt and trans~~t. <br />Shifts In Preferred Uses. <br /> <br />As demographics change and as the economies of <br /> <br />(sh3) <br /> <br />western states become more dependent on water for nonagricultural uses, laws <br />~d- <br />will be changed to express new preferences. Arizona's new water law is a <br />f\ <br />99 <br />prime example. It gives strong preference to municipal and industrial uses <br /> <br />and is a patent attempt to phase out low-valued, highly consumptive agricul- <br /> <br />tural uses. <br /> <br />(sn3) <br /> <br />Anti-Export Le~islation. Efforts to protect water originating in a state <br /> <br />from being transported out of state are likely to increase. Protective legis- <br /> <br />- 28 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.