My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05306
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05306
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:46 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:57:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.700
Description
Colorado River
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/3000
Author
Getches and Meyers
Title
The River of Controversy - Persistent Issues
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />resource. Extrabasin use of Colorado River w~teL creates an interdependence <br /> <br />with many other watersheds in the ~est. River-dependent areas must look <br /> <br />beyond the basin to augment supplies as their entitlements or obligations <br /> <br />under the law of the river limit the amount of Colorado water available to <br /> <br />them. <br /> <br />To the extent river water is inadequate for Southern California, water <br /> <br />must be drawn from the California State ~ater Project which is supplied by <br /> <br />river systems hundreds of miles to the North. At one point Exxon eyed imports <br /> <br />from the Missouri River Basin in its planning for Oil Shale development in <br /> <br />Western Colorado. From time to time the Southwest has focused on the far <br /> <br />North as a potential source of imported water. Projects to move water from <br /> <br />distant basins such as the Snake, the Columbia, the MacKenzie and the Yukon <br /> <br />have been discussed. <br /> <br />If water is not put to its most productive use in the Colorado River <br /> <br />Basin, water availability and use in other areas may be affected. Ultimately, <br /> <br />this means finding the highest economic uses. Serious conflicts may arise <br /> <br />over two types of useS. First, agriculture, the principal inbasin use, has <br /> <br />difficulty competing economically with municipal and industrial uses that <br />f h b . 25 <br />attract water out 0 t e aS1n. <br /> <br />Second, instream uses tend to get short <br /> <br />26 <br />shrift. Maintaining srream flow is essential to preserve habitat for fish <br /> <br />and wildlife, to supp0rt many types of water-based recreation and to satisfy <br /> <br />aesthetic preferences. But instream values may be overlooked or treated as <br /> <br />unimportant when compared to many extra basin uses. The importance of instream <br /> <br />uses also reaches beyond the basin. Those who benefit from instream values <br /> <br />may live far away but visit the basin occasionally. And wildlife that depends <br /> <br />on habitat in the basin may use it in connection with a several thousand mile <br /> <br />migration. <br /> <br />- 11 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.