Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o <br />CJ1 <br />~ <br />N <br /> <br />Season <br /> <br />R <br /> <br />S <br /> <br />W <br /> <br />Colo, CUL <br /> <br />16 18 14 <br />13 15 7 <br /> <br />Utah CUL <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />The monthly mean flows by season without regulation (with the above <br /> <br />CUL) at the state line (Watson, Utah) and at the inflow into the Green <br /> <br /> <br />River are as follows (additional inflows in Utah are assumed to be zero <br /> <br />in this example): <br /> <br />Season R S W <br />Natural inflow (mean) 93 44 26 <br />Colo, CUL -16 -18 -14 <br />Mean flow at Watson 77 26 12 <br />Utah CUL -13 -15 - 7 <br />Mean flow at Green River 64 11 5 <br /> <br />The monthly low flows by season without regulations are as follows: <br /> <br />Season R S <br />Natural low inflow 53,5 19,8 <br />Colo, CUL -16 -18 <br />Low flow at Watson 37.5 1.8 <br />Utah CUL -13 -15 <br />Low flow at Green River 24.5 -13,2 <br /> <br />W <br /> <br />20.2 <br /> <br />-14 <br />6.2 <br /> <br />- 7 <br /> <br />-,8 <br /> <br />The regulation scheme now illustrated is designed to protect against <br /> <br /> <br />low flow conditions. This protection is assumed for illustrative purposes <br /> <br />to benefit both fish and wildlife, and it assures that the oil shale <br /> <br /> <br />industry would not have to shut down periodically due to a lack of water. <br />