My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05303
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05303
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:46 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:57:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8271.200
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - Development and History - UCRB 13a Assessment
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/1/1978
Author
W Ganter
Title
An Analytical Technique for the Investigation of Flow Regulation
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2 <br /> <br />o NATURAL INFLOW RANDOM VARIABLES <br />CJl <br />00 The major simplification accomplished by this method is the use of <br />CO <br />only three random variables. These random variables represent monthly <br /> <br />inflows in the spring runoff, summer and winter seasons, The spring runoff <br /> <br />random variable, denoted by R, covers the months of April, May and Jtme. <br /> <br />The summer random variable (S) covers July, August and September, The <br /> <br />winter random variable (W) covers the 6 months from October through March, <br /> <br /> <br />S is dependent upon R because the melting snowpack provides IIlUch of <br /> <br />the summer inflows. However, summer rains provide considerable variation <br /> <br />in S which is not dependent upon R. W is independent of R because the <br />snowpack has melted before October. However, some correlation exists from <br />R onto W due to long tenn weather cycles, Since the winter season is <br />frequently in a frozen condition in the Rocky Motmtain region, the range of <br />W inflows is quite narrow. In the White River data, the variation in W <br /> <br />due to both R and the weather cycle correlation (which cannot easily be <br /> <br />separated) is small, <br /> <br />Year to year correlation in R exists, but it is only a small part of <br /> <br />1he total variation in R. This correlation is only significant when a <br />regulation scheme attempts to maintain carryover storage which is large <br />in comparison to annual inflows. This correlation does not affect more <br />modest regulation schemes, In this analytic method this annual correla- <br />tion is ignored (making R independent year to year). However, it should be <br />considered (requiring a large safety stock of carryover storage) whenever <br />the attempted regulation involves a high percentage of the annual inflows. <br />Simulation methods using a time series of historic inflows include the <br />correlation effect. However, it is only one short realization of this effect. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.