My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05287
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05287
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 10:23:54 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:57:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8410.200.60
Description
Basin Multi-State Organizations - Missouri River Basin Commission - Reports
Date
9/24/1969
Author
Not Available
Title
Non-Federal-Project use of Irrigation Water from the Missouri River
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />January, 1970 <br /> <br />position of States concerning imposition of <br />water service charges by the Secretary of <br />the Interior for irrigation water diversions <br />by non-federal-project irrigators from the <br />Missouri River along certain reaches where river <br />water flow characteristics are influenced by <br />reservoirs constructed by the Corps of Engineers. <br /> <br />1. There is no basis in federal reclamation law for irrigation <br />water service charges unless federal project works provide irrigation <br />water supplies (benefits) not otherwise available to water users.ll <br /> <br />2. Congress, by virtue of Sec. l(b) of the Flood Control Act <br />of 1944 (58 Stat. 887) and other acts, granted priority for irriga- <br />tion and other uses of water, present and future, over navigation <br />use in states wholly or partly west of the ninety-eighth meridian.21 <br />Congress, thereby, excluded waters used for such priority purposes <br />from the water stored or otherwise developed by the federal govern- <br />ment pursuant to Sec. 9 of the Flood Control Act of 1944 and other <br />federal project authorizing acts.31 <br /> <br />3. Irrigation water diversions from the Missouri River by non- <br />federal-project users, irrespective of where such diversions are <br />located in states wholly or partly west of the ninety-eighth meridian, <br />are not made from water stored in mainstem reservoirs constructed by <br />t-,np ("nrn~ ()f' F.f'lO; nppr.~ _ 'l'npv ;::Irp mAnp f'rnm fl ()W~ n-f rnp Mi c:~nl1r; <br />- - - <br />River passing through these reservoirs pursuant to priority rights <br />to do so granted by Congress 4/. Federal reclamation law has no <br />application under these conditions.51 ' <br /> <br />11 Federal reclamation laws, applicable to furnishing water <br />for non-federal-project irrigation, are the Warren Act (1911) <br />(36 Stat. 925) and Sec. 9(e) of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 <br />(53 Stat. 1187). The Warren Act provides that the Secretary of the <br />Interior may contract with non-federal-project irrigators for impound- <br />ed, stored or carried waters which are surplus to federal project <br />requirements. Sec. 9(e) of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 pro- <br />vides that the Secretary of the Interior may enter into contracts <br />with non-federal-project irrigators to furnish water from federal <br />works connected with water supply and allocated to irrigation. Under <br />either of these laws, the contracts cover the furnishing of irriga- <br />tion water supplies developed by federal project works when alterna- <br />tive water supplies are not available to irrigators. <br /> <br />21 Based upon numerous U.S. Supreme Court decisions, it is <br />generally accepted that, under its constitutional power to regulate <br />commerce, dispose of federal property, or provide for the general <br />welfare, Congress may develop the Nation's water resources and <br />establish the criteria for such development. As T. Richard Wittmer, ' <br />Counsel, Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, House of <br />Representatives, says on page 20, Committee Print No. 19, 86th <br />Congress, 2nd Session, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.