Laserfiche WebLink
<br />O~'7"" <br />U 1 .: I <br /> <br />Desert Washes <br />--- <br /> <br />In the desert regions where stream courses consist of deep alluvial <br />desert washes, the surface flow is limited to flash floods that recharge <br />the ground-water reserves. The vegetation in these areas is usually <br />dominated by mesquite, which obtains its water from the deep alluvial <br />deposits. These groves of mesquite, which are so abundant in parts of <br />Arizona, undoubtedly use a fairly large amount of water from these <br />deeper sources which, in some cases, can be salvaged. Mesquite stands <br />have some values for wildlife, but they usually have a low recreational <br />value except in a few isolated spots near main roads or reservoirs. <br /> <br />Playas <br /> <br />In the great basin and other parts of the al-id Southwest, there are <br />numerouS interior drainage basins, of which the playa is the central <br />part. In many cases, the playas have water close enough to the surface <br />to be called wet playas, and typical phreatophytes such as pickleweed, <br />greasewood,~and rabbitbrush grow in a zonal arrangement from the edge <br />of the playa outwards. Large areas of greasewood have been included <br />in the reports of phreatophyte acreages in the United States. In some <br />cases, it is doubtful if the management of this vegetation could <br />contribute much in the way of water savings. The water is frequently <br />alkaline, and therefore cannot be used for irrigation or domestic uses. <br />Management of areas of this type would be indicated for the development <br />of grass stands for grazing of livestock. One possibility is to inter- <br />cept ground water upslope from the area of phreatophyte use by pumping <br />with wells for beneficial use of the water. Other uses, such as recrea- <br />tion and wildlife, are almost nonexistent in these playa edges. There <br />are, of course, areas where vegetation of this type may be growing close <br />to flowing streams or rivers so that the losses of fresh water would <br />indicate management to a less water-loving vegetation. <br /> <br />Summary <br /> <br />It is evident that the problems of land management vary a great deal <br />on phreatophyte and riparian lands. Basically, the approach in manage- <br />ment must be first to determine the best economic use. \.Je need to know <br />how much water is actually lost by the vegetation as it now exists, and <br />also be able to estimate the amount which might be saved by various <br />vegetation treatments. Then, if vegetation removal or management is <br />indicated from a water-salvage standpoint, methods of controlling the <br />various phreatophytes will have to be developed. Many of the species, <br />particularly tamarisk, are very difficult to control. They are aggres- <br />sive, rapidly invading moist areas; also the mature plants are quite <br />difficult to remove economically. In many cases, however, water savings <br />have been sufficiently great to justify the expense. The situation in <br />mountain vegetation is even more difficult because of the complexity of <br />the intermingled present and potential uses of such land. <br /> <br />And finally, if increased water is produced by land management, definite <br />problems of water rights begin to become apparent. It is around this <br />outline that we have developed our symposium program. <br /> <br />5 <br />