My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05273
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05273
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:38 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:56:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.470
Description
Pacific Southwest Interagency Committee
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
8/30/1966
Author
Unknown
Title
Phreatophyte Symposium 66-3 Meeting - August 30 1966
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />removal but is ineffective as a control on small plants because of <br />the tendency of the small plants to bend over rather than break off <br />or pull up. <br /> <br />To obtain the maximum control when removing tamarisk, it is necessary <br />to remove the crown of the plant without burying any stems. One of <br />the most effective machines for removing the crowns of large adult <br />plants is the rock rake (photograph 6). <br /> <br />When conditions permit, ground spray equipment is used extensively <br />for application of herbicides. From field applications which have <br />been made, it appears that approximately 3 pounds of silvex per acre <br />will result in reasonably good control of tamarisk. Two pounds of <br />2,4-D amine salt have been effective on willows. Herbicides are most <br />effective when applied to plants that are young, tender, and full of <br />vigor. During 1965, 1,900 acres of phreatophytes in New Mexico and <br />160 acres in Nevada were sprayed with various formulations of herbi- <br />cides using ground spray equipment (photograph 7); and about 1,500 <br />acres in New Mexico were sprayed in 1966. <br /> <br />The cost for operating ground spray rigs has averaged from $6 to $9 <br />per acre depending on the rate of chemical application and the type <br />of material used. <br /> <br />Aerial application (photograph 8) of herbicides can be an effective <br />procedure for phreatophyte contro~ particularly where the plants are <br />small and growing rapidly. Most of this work has been accomplished <br />on the Middle Rio Grande floodway near Albuquerque and in areas where <br />annual reinfestation is common. The helicopter has been used exten- <br />sively for application. From field tests, the best results have been <br />obtained when spraying 3 pounds of silvex per acre. The cost of this <br />work has varied from $8 to $13 per acre when accomplished by contract. <br />During 1965, approximately 2,300 acres of phreatophyte-infested areas <br />were sprayed by helicopter on the Rio Grande and 410 acres were sprayed <br />in Nevada. The cost of application in Nevada was $11.47 per acre. In <br />1966, the floodway above and below Albuquerque was sprayed with an <br />invert formulation of 2,4-D amine at a cost of $8.50, and an additional <br />area near Bernardo was sprayed with (2) 2,4,5-TP (silvex) at a cost of <br />$13 per acre. An invert formulation of herbicide is used to reduce <br />spray drift. <br /> <br />The Bureau continues to collect data to support benefits that will be <br />realized for establishment and maintenance of phreatophyte control <br />projects. Other projects of this nature are now being considered. <br />There is still much to be learned, but at least the first steps have <br />been taken toward making water available for beneficial use. <br /> <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.