Laserfiche WebLink
<br />80 <br /> <br /> <br />0=1866 <br />. Peak Discharge - Second-Peet <br />Flood Frequency Inflow Outflow <br />Maximum 155,000 38,000 <br />l,OOO-year 111,000 28,300 <br />500-year 95,000 27,200 <br />250-yeur 78,000 25,500 <br />100-year 58,000 24,000 <br />50-year 1+6,000 22,000 <br />25-year 36,000 l7,000 <br />lO~yeur 25,000 5,000 <br />l-year 6,000 500 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />With this control extensive improvement through Trinidad, for further <br /> <br /> <br />protection against floods, is not justified. Flood discharges <br /> <br /> <br />originating below the dam with their short period of concentration <br /> <br /> <br />would be well out of the way before the regulated discharge from <br /> <br /> <br />the reservoir would reach the city limits. Some repair and minor <br /> <br /> <br />improvements to the channel are needed, since in its present state <br /> <br /> <br />it is unsightly, arId these could well be made from time to time <br /> <br /> <br />to overcome this feature and reclaim lands for useful purposes. <br /> <br />Allocation of Construction Costs <br />In the report on the North Canadian River Projoct, Houso <br />Document No. 569, 75th Congress, 3d Session, 1938, and on other <br />simi.her projects, the War Department based justifiable Federal <br /> <br />. <br />