My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05248
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05248
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:32 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:55:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8507
Description
Rio Grande Project
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Date
1/1/1935
Title
Resume of the Problem Concerning the Rio Grande Above Fort Quitman/ Texas
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.''''., <br />~)~" <br /> <br />by the states of New Mexico and Texas, the representatives of' these <br />states feeling that major reservoir development in Colorado would <br />deplete the f'low of the stream to such an extent as to jeopardize the <br /> <br />water supply of' the lands that are irrigated in New Mexico and Texas. <br /> <br />The representatives of these states have alleged also that depletion <br /> <br />of the water supplies of the river by increased use in Colorado, since <br /> <br />the initiation of the Elephant Butte Reservoir, has already progressed <br /> <br />to the point that severe shortages would occur on the Rio Grande projeot <br /> <br />during cyoles of low stream flow. During past compact negotiations, the <br /> <br />representatives of New Mexico and Texas have insisted that the state <br /> <br />line outflow, as it existed during these negotiations, should not be <br /> <br />changed in any way by the Colorado water users. They not only insist <br /> <br />tljat the yearly flow should remain the same, but that monthly regimen <br /> <br />should not be disturbed. However, these representatives have conoeded <br /> <br />that inoreased uses of' water could be made in Colorado in an amount <br /> <br />equal to water which might be recovered to the stream by future drainage <br /> <br />development. No increased uses of' water in Colorado can be made under <br /> <br />present conditions without more storage development, and such develop- <br />ment necessarily would have to be in a substantial amount as compared <br /> <br />with the additional amount of water that would be made available f'or use. <br /> <br />It has been the position of the representatives of Colorado that the <br /> <br />required major reservoir development eould be made CD1 the Rio Grande in <br /> <br />Colorado to equal:l.ze the water that is now being used, and that this <br /> <br />would not result in any substantial increased depletion of' the flow <br /> <br />across the state line, and that the reservoir construction in conjunction <br /> <br />-4- <br /> <br />(, "" ,nt"'~) <br />',.J'.," t:.-;.J,,;J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.