My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05236
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05236
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:29 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:55:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.106
Description
Animas-La Plata
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
2/26/1996
Title
Final Biological Opinion - 1996
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Biological Opinion
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />(M&I) benefits if an annual depletion of the project is limited to <br />57,100 AF. <br /> <br />The design capacity for the Durango Pumping Plant under the 57,100 AF <br />scenario is 70 cfs. This means that under full operating head (full <br />reservoir) the pumps can pump 70 cfs, but when there is not full head <br />(reservoir not full) the pumps can pump up to 79 cfs. This reduces <br />the peak withdrawals during high streamflow months compared to the <br />1991 proposal. The hydrologic effects of these changes in the model <br />are very minor with respect to San Juan River flows at Farmington, <br />Shiprock, and Bluff. A separate hydrologic model of Animas and La <br />Plata drainages incorporated these changes. Output from this model <br />was then applied to the entire San Juan Basin model. <br /> <br />2. Minor San Juan Basin Depletions under the SJRIP <br /> <br />As part af the RIP, minor depletions up to a total of 3,000 AF are <br />allowed in the basin prior to the completion of the 7-year research <br />period. Since 1991, these depletions have consisted largely of small <br />private uses and now total about 1,500 AF. Although these actual <br />points of diversion are known, due to the small quantities involved <br />and the difficulty in tying them to specific nodes in the model, <br />one-third of this total was assumed to occur above Navajo Dam and <br />two-thirds just below Farmington. This represents an over <br />conservative assumption but since the depletions quantities were <br />small, this simplification will not materially affect the projected <br />flows at the three San Juan River gages. The total depletion of <br />these uses will average less than 3 cfs through the year. <br /> <br />3. Navajo Indian Irrigation Projects (NIIP) Blocks 7 and 8 <br /> <br />Since the 1991 Opinion was issued, the NIIP has received section 7 <br />clearance for construction of facilities to deliver water to lands <br />served by Blocks 7 and 8 of NIIP. No additional depletion of San <br />Juan River Basin water resulted since baseline depletions associated <br />with the Hogback and Fruitland diversions were exchanged for the <br />additional NIIP depletion. Water for NIIP was delivered out of <br />Navajo Reservoir through the existing NIIP canal headworks. This <br />diversion was modeled accordingly. <br /> <br />4. Reduction of Dolores River Basin Return Flows into McElmo Creek <br /> <br />The potential to reallocate additional water supplies for instream <br />flow purposes below McPhee Dam on the Dolores River has resulted in a <br />modification of the expected transbasin diversions out of the Dolores <br />Basin into the San Juan Basin. Consequently, the return flows from <br />this irrigation water will also decrease. <br /> <br />The nature of the decrease in diversions is tied to the instream flow <br />needs below McPhee Dam. During dry years, additional releases are <br />desired to maintain the trout fishery immediately downstream of the <br />dam. Rather than allocate additional supplies in all years, a <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.