Laserfiche WebLink
<br />36 <br /> <br />used by eagles during Stage B and Phase II of the project. Also, some loss of <br />cottonwood trees may occur with canal abandonment. The Service has considered <br />these impacts and developed conservation recommendations to reduce impacts to <br />bald eagles. It is the Service's biological opinion that the Project, as <br />described herein, is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the <br />bald eagle. <br /> <br />CUMULATIVE EFFECTS <br /> <br />Cumulative effects include the effects of future State, local, or private <br />actions that are reasonably certain to occur in the action area considered in <br />this biological opinion. Future Federal actions that are unrelated to the <br />proposed action are not considered in this section because they require <br />separate consultation pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. <br /> <br />One private activity that is likely to occur in the future and could affect <br />bald eagles'is the increased housing development in rural areas in La Plata <br />County, Colorado. Development in the floodplain is occurring now and is <br />expected to increase in the future. Reclamation's surveys found that bald <br />eagles did not use areas where there is a lot of residential development. <br />Roost sites, potential nest sites, and areas of general use by bald eagles <br />could all be adversely affected by private development activity. The Service <br />is not aware of any future State actions that could affect bald eagles. <br /> <br />The Service is not aware of any future State, local, or private projects, that <br />would not require a Federal action, that may affect Colorado squawfish or <br />razorback sucker. <br /> <br />REASONABLE AND PRUDENT ALTERNATIVE <br /> <br />The Service believes, based on the analysis of the hydrological and biological <br />information, that implementation of all the following elements will avoid the <br />likelihood of jeopardizing the continued existence of Colorado squawfish and <br />razorback sucker; and avoid destruction or adverse modification of critical <br />habitat. Reclamation agrees to carry out all of the elements of the <br />reasonable and prudent alternative. These actions will serve as a reasonable <br />and prudent alternative so long as they are completed and/or implemented <br />before Project depletions occur. <br /> <br />1. After reviewing baseline hydrological conditions and how Reclamation <br />could operate Navajo Dam to mimic the natural hydrograph, the Service <br />determined that an initial depletion not to exceed 57,100 acre-feet <br />for the Project is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of <br />the Colorado squawfish or razorback sucker nor adversely modify or <br />destroy their critical habitat, assuming the implementation of all <br />elements of the reasonable and prudent alternative. This depletion is <br />that portion of the Project available from the construction of Phase <br />1, Stage A. Only those Project features which result in a depletion <br />of 57,100 acre-feet (Phase I, Stage A) will be constructed and <br />operated pursuant to this biological opinion. However, the <br />Animas-La Plata Project deDletion can not exceed an annual maximum of <br />57,100 acre-feet in any year, as calculated at the Bluff gage (located <br />