My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05213
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:25 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:54:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8407
Description
Platte River Basin - River Basin General Publications
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
3/1/1982
Author
Arthur D Little Inc
Title
Six State High Plains-Ogallala Aquifer Regional Resources Study - Study Element B-2 - National and Regional Price Impact Assessment
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />n~~~!3 <br />' I ^ '. _)" ~.~; <br />VU~~ A <br /> <br />lure. and cultivated summer fallow !/. land temporarily idled or diverted <br /> <br /> <br />to pasture use, and land once cropped but still considered by the farm <br /> <br /> <br />operator to be readily convertible back to crops). <br /> <br />Over the years the Census of Agriculture has been the primary source <br />of cropland data. The only other source of comprehensive nationwide data <br />has been the Soil Conservation Service (SCS), which conducted the Conserva- <br />tion Needs Inventories of 1958 and 1967, the 1975 Potential Cropland Study, <br />and the 1977 National Resource Inventory. The basic difference between the <br />two sources is that Census reports the farm operator's appraisal of land <br />use and the SCS reports a professional agriculturalist's judgement based on <br />examination of a sample plot or point. <br /> <br />The main difference in results is where land is in a perennial grass and <br />pastured. The farm ~perator may consider this a temporary diversion from <br />cropland to pasture and report it as cropland pasture on his Census ques- <br />tionnaire even though some years have elapsed since it was last tilled. <br />The SCS conservationist, seeing no evidence of recent tillage, may judge <br />the field to be permanent pasture. Thus, the SCS inventories have had con- <br />sistently lower estimates of total cropland acreage--413 million in 1977 <br />compared with the 1974 ESCS estimate of 465 million acres. The difference <br /> <br />is largely land identified as cropland pasture in Census-based ESCS esti- <br /> <br />mates and as permanent pasture in SCS estimates. <br /> <br />1/ Cultivated summer fallow is included as a land input for crop <br />production in a given year on the assumption that many acres of <br />harvested wheat require two years of tillage to get one crop. <br /> <br />II-55 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.