|
<br />C\l
<br />r:;.
<br />r-
<br />C\1
<br />c.
<br />
<br />xvi
<br />
<br />CONTENTS
<br />
<br />Page
<br />
<br />CHAPTER IX . SUPREME COURT OPINION - ARIZONA V. CALIFORNIA OF JUNE 3. 1963, 373
<br />U,S. 546; AND DECREE OF MARCH 9, 1964,376 U_S. 340
<br />
<br />A. Issues
<br />
<br />..... .......... ..,... ..".... ......". .... ...." ....................
<br />
<br />143
<br />
<br />B, Boulder Canyon Project Act Controlled Apportionment. , . . , .
<br />
<br />144
<br />
<br />C. Compact, Prior Appropriation and Equitable Apportionment
<br />Inapplicable . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .......,...,.........
<br />
<br />144
<br />
<br />D, States Control Use of Tributaries, .
<br />
<br />...............,. ...." .... ........, ,.....,...
<br />
<br />144
<br />
<br />E. Congress PrOVided for Apportionment of Water . . . , . .
<br />
<br />145
<br />
<br />E.1
<br />E.2
<br />
<br />Prior Appropriation Inapplicable , . . . . , . . , , . . . . . , , . .
<br />State Water Law Inapplicable . . , . . . . . . . . , , , . . . . . . .
<br />
<br />145
<br />145
<br />
<br />F. Secretary Can Charge States for Diversions Above Lake Mead . . , .
<br />
<br />146
<br />
<br />G, Secretarial Control of Mainstream Below Lee Ferry, . . , , , . . . . , . . . . . , , , . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . 146
<br />
<br />H. Secretary's Sole Right to Contract for Water. . , , . . . , , . . . . , . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . . , , , . . , , , 146
<br />
<br />I. Apportionment in Time of Shortage. , , , . . , , , , , . , , . . . , . . . , . . , . . . , , , . . . . , , , . . . . , . . 147
<br />
<br />J. Arizona-New Mexico Gila Controversy. . , , . . . , . . . , , , . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . , , . . . . . 147
<br />
<br />K. Claims ofthe United States. . , . . . , , . , . . . , . . . , , . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . , , , . . . . , , , . . . , , . . . 147
<br />
<br />K,1
<br />K,?
<br />K.3
<br />K.4
<br />
<br />Indian Reservations. Winter's Doctrine. , . . . , . . . . . . , , . . . , , . . . . . , , . . . . . , . . . ,
<br />Inappropriate to Determine Boundary Disputes . , , , . . . . . . . . . , , , . . . . , , . . . . . , . .
<br />Other Federal Establishments . . . , , . . , , , . . . , . . . , . . , . . . , , , . . . . , , , . . . , , , . . ,
<br />Uses by United States . , , , . . , , . . . , , . . . , , . . . , . . . . , , . . . . . , , , . . . , . . . . , , , . .
<br />
<br />147
<br />147
<br />148
<br />148
<br />
<br />L. Dissents to Opinion , . . . , , , , . . , , , . . . . , . . , , , . . , , . . . , , . . . , , , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . , . . . 148
<br />
<br />M. Supreme Court Opinion of June 3, 1963, and Decree of
<br />March 9, 1964 , , . . . . , , , . . . . , , . . . . , . . . , , . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . .
<br />
<br />149
<br />
<br />CHAPTER X . PRESENT PERFECTED RIGHTS
<br />
<br />A. Background
<br />
<br />................ ....... ... ......... ...... .......... .... .......
<br />
<br />151
<br />
<br />B, Determination Required by Decree, Article VI , . , , . , , , , , , , .. , , . . , , , , . , , , , , , . . , , . . . . . 151
<br />
<br />C, Importance of Present Perfected Rights , , , , , . , , , . , , , , , , . . , , , . . , , . . . . , , , , . . . , . , . . , , 152
<br />
<br />D. Effect of Section 301 (b) of Basin Project Act. . , , . . . , . . . , . . . . , . . , , . . . , , , , . . . , . . , , , , . 152
<br />
|