Laserfiche WebLink
<br />._~ <br /> <br />~"';V""_--",,"'~-~"""'-'~ - <br /> <br />..........a...... ... ......., .......","', <br /> <br />8-16-96 4:52PM; 970 385 6539 -> <br />.:.r ISUH.WCAOI tOj '11 <br /> <br />303 866 4474; <br /> <br />#17/22 <br /> <br />SENT BY: BOR-WCAOS SD; <br /> <br />SWQBINMED Summar}- <br />August 12, 1996 <br />Page 15 <br /> <br />tnlllmVit of Irrifltlliml ,,""rII/luws, The purpose of the cn,.jromnenta! impar.t JIroC"ss is to avoid <br />these effects during the planning phase prior to any construction. <br /> <br />These conol\1l1ioDli compare the Project soib to soils with contents commonly ranging up to 80,000 <br />ppb and then conclude that "total selenium found in soils is comparatively low throughout the <br />Project" and that "loog-tenn impacts to in'igation rer.um flow water quality are expected to be low." <br />WI do not flI711, <br /> <br />l:nntAm;nSlfttlnapact A~vu:mm1t <br /> <br />The A./i.,essment found that, with the: exception of mercury, mean concentrations of l!to: .lililiUl vw <br />trace elemCllts never exceeded the EP A aquatic life criteria. The Assessment considers that <br />contaminatiOl1 of the mercury samples collected from the La Plata River durina this study is a <br />possibility. Once again, there ere me,jor problems with this Assesmlent. Geometric MCMS of data <br />are used for comparison to the EP A aquatic life criteria in order to ddlllIlline potential problems. <br />No comparisons are made with the New MCltico water quality standards and no comparisons are <br />wade using the actual individual sample resul~. The Assessment assumes that only the dissolved <br />frl1Ouon of the water "conWlllI those elements that are potentially bioavailablc and mar result in <br />toxicologic.a1 responses in an aquatic ecosystem.." Wl! tIIJ ._,7ft wlti tIt& _1UIIpIID1C tIS 811D_ <br />by tlu, Stm IIIDIdJuds wldcft.JtH' """IIIY tlIUI ulnIiIurI, rezaltlk two diflt!fe1lt "total" /NlJ:liDl/S, <br /> <br />Table 13 (Pllie 50) lists the total nwnbers of samples and the maximum concentrations of seven <br />dissolved tral:e elements in the La Plata River and compares these to tho BPA aquuic life CriteriL <br />The maximum concen1ration of dinolved selenium was 9 /-LiIL, 4,5 times tbll New Mexico water <br />quality standald for total recovenble !lelenium, !be maximum concentration of dill.~lved mereury <br />was 0.4 I-LgfL, 33 times the New Mexico Water quality standard for IQ1al mercury, No other <br />dissolved trace elements reportedly exceeded the F.P A aquatic life ctiteria in the La Plata Rh-er, <br /> <br />Table 14 (pIae 51) This table lists the llcometric: means of dissolved elements in samples from the <br />La Plata Rinr. The AssessmDllt dt:lerminelllhal "[h]azard quotients for the &eOmetric mean <br />COD.ceutrations of dissolved element3 (in the La Plata River] inditatcd that, coppc:r and selenium were <br />low hazards JUggesting that some potential for sublethal effects should be considered." The <br />i""'mmric. me""" of dissolved mercury for the La Plata River in New Mexico are an order of <br />magnitude above the EP A lICluatic life criterion for IDllIClII)' and an order of magnitude above the <br />New Mexico water quality stuldcd for kI1il mercury. Based on the geometric mean of the dissolved <br />mercury concenlrll1iOlll!l. the Assessment detmnined that mP.1'ClIrV ~rflV;Tltto-il a mnderate h"7.1.d to <br />aql."tic lif;. The Assessment states that "{m]ercury concentrations in fish tissues would not be <br />expected to elluse adverse efl'Kts on the fish ~mmun1ty, but do ~sent a hA7"rd to fish_tin" <br />birds and mammals in the lII'llIl," preSUJJlllbly iDcludina humans, [Emphasis added] We mll8t again <br />roitcrate t1ll!t individual values were nor comp~ to the New Mexico standards and that use of only <br />dissolved values is of little value in detenninina the likely impa'la from this proposed project. <br /> <br />I~' <br />123 <br />