My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05167
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05167
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:15 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:53:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.104.I
Description
Flaming Gorge
State
UT
Basin
Yampa/White/Green
Date
10/1/2001
Author
Clayton-Gilmore
Title
Flaming Gorge Environmental Impact Statement Hydrologic Modeling Study Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />5 <br />period, The model restricts these flows to the range from 800 to 4600 cfs to lower the reservoir <br />elevation to a target of2027 feet above sea level by the beginning of March, These constraints <br />are violated only when the reservoir elevation gets too high for safe operation of the Flaming <br />Gorge Dam (6040 feet above sea level), In March and April, releases are controlled between 800 <br />and 4600 cfs to achieve a reservoir elevation target of 6027 feet above sea level by May. The <br />rule, which operates Flaming Gorge Dam during March and April is identical in both the Action <br />and No Action rulesets, <br /> <br />Modeling Assumptions <br /> <br />Because of the limitations of the modeling environment, many assumptions were made in <br />the development of the Green River model and the Action and No Action rulesets. The <br />assumptions that are specific to this model are described below: <br /> <br />I. Actual historic forecasting of the spring (April through July) Wlfegulated inflow volume <br />for Flaming Gorge is assumed to represent the current and future level of forecast <br />accuracy. Forecasted spring unregulated inflow volumes into Flaming Gorge have been <br />issued by the National Weather Service since 1963. The Green River model generates <br />spring unregulated inflow forecasts with an error distribution that is similar to the <br />historical error distribution. <br /> <br />2. It is assumed that the timing and magnitude of the peak flow of the Yampa River can be <br />predicted accurately at least 10 days prior to its occurrence. To achieve the spring flow <br />objectives of the Action Alternative, while efficiently managing the resources of Flaming <br />Gorge, the peak release from Flaming Gorge must be optimally timed with the peak flows <br />of the Yampa River. The magnitude of the peak release from Flaming Gorge Dam must <br />also be optimally chosen to efficiently supplement flows on the Yampa River. <br /> <br />3. It is assumed that decisions regarding the operation of Flaming Gorge will be made at the <br />beginning of each month. Even when conditions change mid-month, decisions to react to <br />the changing conditions must wait until the beginning of the following month. In reality, <br />operational decisions at Flaming Gorge Dam are made on a daily basis but the Green <br />River model is limited by the monthly timestep process. <br /> <br />4. It is assumed that the natural hydrology of the Green River Basin (from 2002 to 2040) <br />will be similar in the future to the natural hydrology that occurred during the period from <br />1921 to 1985. <br /> <br />5. Whenever flow objectives for Reach Two are achieved it is assumed that the flow <br />objectives for Reach Three are also achieved, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.