Laserfiche WebLink
<br />24 <br />FIGURE 20 Distribution of Peak Flows in Reach Two <br /> <br />Flow Durations (May - July) <br />Reach 2 <br /> <br />50000 <br /> <br /> I I <br /> ..(;)- No Action Peak Flow <br /> -H- Historic Peak Flow (71-91) <br /> +- All - 1 Peak Flow <br />~ - All Peak Flow <br />~ <br /> -;l \.. <br /> '" <br /> ......... <br /> ~ M. <br /> ......... <br /> "l.!::l; <br /> <br />40000 <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />30000 <br /> <br />~ <br />o <br />[i; <br />20000 <br /> <br />10000 <br /> <br />9J% <br /> <br />20% <br /> <br />40% 60% <br />Percentlixceeded <br /> <br />80% <br /> <br />100% <br /> <br />Figure 20 shows the distributions of peak flows that occurred in Reach Two during the <br />spring, Figures 21 and 22 show distributions for flows in Reach Two that had a duration of two <br />and four weeks, respectively, Figure 21 shows a noticeable increase in the Action (ALL) results <br />at about 40% exceedance, This was a result of the Action(ALL) ruleset attempting to achieve the <br />18,600 cfs objective, <br />