Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SUMMARY OF COLORADO RIVER WORKSHOP <br /> <br />v <br /> <br />I <br />discussed these ideas in a general session challenging and supporting the authors on <br />. <br />a variety of topics. Many fell that there was no need to revisit the 1922 compact. <br />OtherS pointed out the changes, i.e., water marketing, that are underway within Ihe <br />basin ~re examples of the flexibility of the current system, But many embraced the <br />idea ~f a more regional approach and the inclusion of more stakeholders in the <br />proceSs. The prominent position of the the Nalional Park Service as a manager of the <br />lands surrounding a large section of the river was discussed, Native Americans pre- <br />sent pointed OUI that their needs had been long neglected and thai many of the issues <br />before' this group depended on the resolution of these issues. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />This discussion allowed an informal airing of issues from many interest groups and <br />contributed to a general understanding by all who attended, While Ihere remained <br />fundamental disagreements over solutions to many basin issues, substantial agree- <br />ment was reached on key components necessary to creale a workable dialogue among <br />these various parlies. These tenets include processes that include the range and diver- <br />sily of stakeholder interests fostering communication and cooperation, and the need <br />for fai~ness, equity, and consistency in management. <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Consulting firms ond individuals <br />Federal agencies <br />State agencies <br />Environmental/Recreation <br />Municipal/Industry <br />Agricultural/Rural <br />Tribal <br />Utilities, power users <br />Other <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />19% <br />17% <br />12% <br />11% <br />10% <br />10% <br />10% <br />7% <br />5% <br /> <br />The Colorado River Workshop did not arrive at consensus, but it successfully brought togeth- <br />er a s:t of involved stakeholders from across the basin who represented diverse and often con- <br />flicting interests. That format provided open, substantive discussion of important topics and <br />set a positive example for future issue oriented forums. <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />J <br />