My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05164
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05164
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:14 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:53:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.20.F.1
Description
Grand Canyon Trust
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
4/1/1997
Author
Grand Canyon Trust
Title
Colorado River Basin Management Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />In October 1994, Grand Canyon Trust entered into a two-year cooperative, cost-shar- <br />ing agreement with the Bureau of Reclamation tej conduct a study that identifies basin <br />management issues and describes balanced, div~rse perspectives and thinking about <br />current and future management of water and related resources in the Colorado River <br />basin. The results will be used to identify potertial approaches which can help the <br />Bureau of Reclamation in meeting its responsibilIties in management of Colorado River <br />basin resources. The study incorporated facilita\ed discussiol15 with a wide range of <br />water users, managers and oth~r stakeholders throughout the basin. <br />The three goals were to devel~p a comprehensive summary of the <br />emerging trends and management issues facing Colorado River basin <br />resource managers, solicit and ~ompile the concerns and recommen- <br />dations of people and organiz~tions interested in basin issues; and <br />establish a workable dialogue afong these various parties. The study <br />workplan has been Uexible, refponding to input from stakeholders <br />and evolving to produce the m~st useful product possible. <br /> <br /> <br />INTEREST GROUPS: <br />. Federal agencies <br />. Tribal <br />. Agriculture/rural <br />. Municipal/Industry <br />. State agencies <br />. Individual <br />. Environmental <br />. Power <br />. Academic <br /> <br />GEOGRAPHIES: <br />. Arizona <br />. Colorado <br />. Utah <br />. California <br />. Nevada <br />. New Mexico <br />. Wyoming <br />. Other <br /> <br />Tatal # of Participants <br /> <br />19% <br />16% <br />14% <br />13% <br />12% <br />11% <br />7% <br />4% <br />4% <br /> <br />26% <br />16% <br />15% <br />13% <br />12% <br />10% <br />6% <br />2% <br /> <br />The effort was designed to be i~clusive rather than exclusive. For the <br />purpose of the study the Colonido River basin is defined as the water- <br />shed of the Colorado River an~ its service areas, an area sometimes <br />referred to as the "hydrocommors," Therefore, southern California, the <br />Wasatch Front of Utah, the Frorlt Range of Colorado, and parts of New <br />Mexico:' Rio Grande valley are I included, A stakeholder is defined as <br />anyone with an active interest in! the management of the Colorado River. <br />In theory that could include pri~ate citizel15 on the far side of the conti- <br />nent or around the world, How~ver in practice, we found those active- <br />ly involved in basin issues to be'located within this hydrocommons. <br /> <br />products of the study include :a compilation of emerging trends and <br />management issues Wlthm the J:>asm, the proceedmgs of the Colorado <br />, <br />River Workshop, a stakehOlder~workshoP on future management with- <br />m the basin; and this fmal report suggestmg vari us management approaches drawing on <br />mformation collected from stakeholders m the s udy and the results of the workshop, <br />! <br />During the facilitated discussions portion of th~ study, over 650 water users, managers <br />and other stakeholders of the Colorado River ~ere contacted and asked to characterize <br />the most crilical issues that face, or will face, t~e managers and users of the Colorado <br />River over the next few decades. Participants Were asked to characterize critical man- <br />I <br />agement issues, but no attempt was made to stafistically measure the level of concern or <br />to prioritize issues. Special attention was given \0 attaining broad diversity in geography <br />and interest group representation. Comments rere gathered in individual phone con- <br />versations followed by mailed respol15e forms'IIn addition, thirteen regional meetings, <br />involving over 240 stakeholders and managers, were held to answer questiol15 and <br />receive input. These meetings provided invalu~ble dialogue and insight into the issues <br />of the basin. Stakeholders provided 700 comm~nts (see Appendix I) describing a range <br />of critical management issues, These formed t\te basis for facilitated discussiol15 at the <br />Colorado River Workshop which was attende~ by more than 180 people. Results of <br />these study components are described in sumrj1ary form in this report. <br />! <br />! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.