Laserfiche WebLink
<br />t...> <br />o <br />0') <br />o <br /> <br />loA <br />Ii"'; <br />..."r' E.,,,. ,'. <br />:::':';9 <br />'- - <br />(re:; ';\c;Cj <br /> <br />rCle mass oalances ..ere constructeu Df 1 i st:ing t:ne ,nflow of <br /> <br />~ater ana dissolved sol ids to the study rBacn at tne u~st:redm ~a~ing <br /> <br />stations and from trIbutaries. tne discnar~es of wat:er ana dissolved <br /> <br />sol ids at inter~ediate gagin~ stations. anJ t:he out:flo~ of water <br /> <br />ana oissolved soliJs at the do~nstream 9agin~ statIons. rne <br /> <br />aifferences Detween the inflow and outflow of ~ater and oisso\veO <br /> <br />solids oetween successive mainstem gaging stations were calculated <br /> <br />and shown as an additional gain or loss. <br /> <br />~ater-discnarge and <br /> <br />dissolved-sol i3S budgets for the 1975 water year are snown in taoles <br /> <br />LOA and ll~ for the ~hite River, taole5 12A ana 13A for the ColoradO <br /> <br />I~ River. table 14A for the San Juan River. taole 15A for the ~reen <br />"'i..::'-~ I:; 4 <br />"" <br />~iver in Utah, table lbA for the Green River In ~yomin]. ana table <br />,- ,,;:\ <br /> <br />I.,oj <br />T~,2L~ l.Z,.Q <br />~y~ <br />(sle:lr hl1r~l <br /> <br />17A for the Yampa ~iver. <br /> <br />35 <br />