Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />usbr/wapa <br /> <br />In late July, Western and Reclamation reported to the AMWG its recent decisions. Western <br />statt:u that this was an '.intt:rim" mt:asure until it was able to review interpretation of the ROD <br />and further discuss this with Reclamation and with the AMWG. This paper follows up on the two <br />agencies' coommitments to the AMWG. <br /> <br />II. The Relationship Between Reclamation and Western Rel!ardinlf Operatinlf Glen <br />Canvon <br /> <br />Reclamation's Upper Colorado Region Water Office makes monthly water release schedules in <br />acre-feet for Glen Canyon based upon anticipated inflows to the lake, release requirements to the <br />lower basin and storage targets for the lake. This monthly water schedule is passed on to <br />Western's Resource Scheduling Office in Montrose, CO. Western's scheduling office then <br />develops an hourly release schedule. This schedule takes into account Glen Canyon ROD <br />requirements and the requirements and agreements made by Western and Reclamation regarding <br />the operation of the other CRSP powerplants. Western's dispatch office in Phoenix, Arizona then <br />provides Reclamation's Glen Canyon Power Operations Center with a daily, 24 hour operating <br />schedule, identifying Western's desired hourly electric power schedule (in megawatts). This <br />schedule is then put into the computer system at Glen Canyon by Reclamation2. This schedule <br />then becomes the megawatt quantities which are targeted during the "real time" operation at Glen <br />Canyon Dam. <br /> <br />The Glen Canyon Power Operations Center operators utilize the generation schedule supplied by <br />Western to operate the generating units while giving consideration to efficiency and equipment <br />characteristics. In addition, the generators automatically respond to a "regulation signal" <br />developed and electronically transmitted to the dam by Western for continuous response to <br />power system load and frequency changes. (This is further described later in this paper). <br /> <br />III. Recent Historv ofthe "Flexibility" Within Operation Constraints <br /> <br />Shortly after Interim Flows began (August, 1991), Western met with staff at the Glen Canyon <br />Environmental Studies (GCES) and with other Reclamation representatives. Western requested <br />flexibility in order to regulate an electrical control area. This resulted in an agreement whereby <br />Western was allowed to fluctuate 10% around any operational constraint and that Western would <br />meet with GCES staff monthly to discuss any operational issues that surfaced. Thus, the Interim <br />Flow downramp requirement of 1,500 cfs could be as high as 1,650 cfs and still be in compliance <br />(1.500 cfs + 150 cfs). <br /> <br />2 This computer "system" consists of hardware and software and has the name of Supervisory Control And <br />Data Acquisition (SCADA), <br /> <br />2 <br />