Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I' <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />0005 J1.. <br /> <br /> <br />COLORADO RIVER INDIAN TRIBES <br />Colorado River Indian Reservation <br /> <br />ROUTE 1, BOX23-B <br />PARKER ARIZONA 853:t-4~___ P' <br />TELEPHONE (602) 669-9~f 1, .:'. <br />1 ..Ir.{ I" <br />March 25, 1998 ;_'c, <br />: s<:-'. <br /> <br />.. .._-----~-~ <br />- 'It:: ~f'~', i <br />.::.R 23 ;gsa 1 <br />i <br />---,,-_.- - '--'--". <br /> <br />'. ,- <br /> <br />Mr. Dale Ensming~r <br />Boulder Canyon Operations Office <br />Bureau of Reclamation <br />P.O. Box 61470 <br />Boulder City, Nevada 89006-1470 <br /> <br />:_' ''f/1 <br /> <br />(J"ci.;:ClO('!j- . <br />Gf:L.- - 444 3 <br />.1:". PP .. PO <br /> <br />...._..... __ou."-'. <br /> <br />Subject: Proposed Rule for Offstream Storage of Colorado River Water. <br /> <br />-. <br />.,r _~...._-... <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Ensminger, <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />......-.-..-.--..-... 1 <br />.--'-"-'--- <br /> <br />The Colorado River Indian Tribes (CRIT) Water Resources Department has reviewed the above- <br />referenced document (Proposed Rule) and can provide the following comments: <br /> <br />CRIT supports the concept of water banking and the ability of entitlement holders to store their <br />unused and surplus water for either their own use during shortage or marketing to other users. <br />CRIT also supports the concept of interstate marketing of unused and surplus water. <br /> <br />CRIT appreciates the specific attention made in the Proposed Rule to Indian Tribes and the <br />Tribes present perfected rights. As is well-known, the Tribes perfected rights are separate and <br />apart from the State water delivery contracts and are not to be impaired by the Secretary's <br />delivery of water to each State under those contracts. Since this Proposed Rule is only applicable <br />to State-authorized entities, it follows that it must only be applicable to entities that the States <br />control or those that the States recognize as independent of State control but still able to deal <br />with the States. in this regard, CR.Ji would encourage the States to recognize the Tribes as <br />"authorized entities" so that the States may deal with the Tribes. <br /> <br />CRIT is concerned that some definitions and positions taken in this Prqposed Rule may set an <br />adverse model for the Secretary's future dealings with the Tribes. Of particular concern is the <br />term "intentionally created unused apportionment" and the concept that one State will release it's <br />water for use in another State, also called "forbearance". <br /> <br />CRIT supports the concept that an entitlement holder can intentionally decide to use less water <br />and either store or market that water. In the case of the Tribes, their perfected rights are diversion <br />rights. this means they have a set right and can only divert up to a certain amount of water from <br />the River. It is, therefore, relatively easy for the Tribes to voluntarily reduce their diversion and <br />allow that specific amount of water to be used elsewhere. It is a straight-forward and easily <br />