Laserfiche WebLink
<br />C',J <br />.... <br />t:) <br />e"! <br /> <br />c: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />/" dl1:'t<, J J,,;;e. r . ' R /J .. <br />~:~~~i!' jt,/ ~~ ~ ~ <br /> <br />'..J <br />)'!;'- <br />.(ie'!;. <br />'. *,) <br />'''''A~' <br />'\<'~.' <br /> <br />" <br />f' <br /> <br />"'. <br />~.u... ,;nJ /1' J ;; <br />J:?,l, ./ <br /> <br />RESUME OF INSPECTION TRIP THROUGH THE LOWER COLORADO RIVER BASIN <br /> <br />> <br />;1 <br />" <br />; <br /> <br />i <br />< <br /> <br />On December 5, 1958, the undersigned, accompanied by <br />R. M. Gildersleeve were conducted on a tour of Hoover Dam by the <br />U. S. B. R. The items of prime interest that resulted from thi~ <br />tour is the fact that: <br /> <br />1. Of the 16 generators installed at Hoover only four <br />are interconnected with the Davis-Parker power system. <br />The other generators are used to serve the allottee- <br />owners directly. This results in an inefficiency <br />in water utilization in that the full capacity, and <br />thereby full efficiency, of the generators are not <br />realized. Under such a system, for example, two <br />allottees may each have a generator operating at, <br />say 40% capacity when one generator could serve both <br />at a much greater efficiency, thereby realizing more <br />energy from the same amount of water passed through. <br /> <br />2. Six of the generators are combination 50 and 60 cycle <br />units although they produce 60 cycle current now. The <br />type of turbine runner for the combination type gen- <br />erator is quite inefficient, as regards water use, <br />and could now be replaced by a more efficient runner. <br /> <br />3. The allottees are using Hoover power for peaking. <br />The peaks are, of course, uncontrollable thereby <br />causing a loss of control over water released. This <br />may account, at least in part, for the alleged in- <br />ability to control water releases to Mexico. <br /> <br />4. On this date Hoover was discharging 25,000 cfs during <br />daytime hours and 35,000 cfs during the night - to <br />produce contract firm energy. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~, <br /> <br />,', <br /> <br />" <br />, <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />r <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />t'. <br />;:: <br />" <br />~ <br />., <br /> <br />~.~ <br />, <br /> <br />" <br />~~ <br />~i <br />,~ <br />.~- <br />~~ <br />:.::' <br />~ <br />~ <br />p <br />.,' <br />;j <br />~ <br />~ <br />l!i <br />~{ <br />t;~ <br />~i <br />~ <br />~ <br />, <br />~~ <br />~l*" <br />~t~ <br /> <br />On December 6th, Mr. Gildersleeve, Mr. John Barnard, <br />Sr. and the undersigned visited Parker Dam, Davis Dam and <br />Headgate Rock Dam. <br /> <br />Davis Dam was constructed primarily for the regula- <br />tion of Mexican Treaty water, and to provide power incident <br />to such regulation. The operator at Davis Dam confirmed the <br />finding that only four of the Hoover Power/Plant generators <br />are connected with Davis PowerlPlant. The pattern of opera- <br />tion for Davis Dam is that it 1S filled by releases from <br />Hoover during the winter months and then drawn down during the <br />summer irrigating period to satisfy Mexican orders. At the <br />time of our visit the reservoir lacked only from six to eight <br />feet to being full. <br /> <br />Parker Dam was constructed to provide a desilting <br /> <br />~~. <br />':'.y <br />:~~ <br /> <br /> <br />.:-- <br /> <br />IJII"/J~ !<-./5 <br /> <br />,- <br />