My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05120
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05120
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:03 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:52:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.760
Description
Yampa River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
1/1/1983
Author
USGS
Title
Reservoir Development Impacts on Surface-Water Quantity and Quality in the Yampa River Basin - Colorado and Wyoming - 1983
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />>''-". <br /> <br />001894 <br /> <br />, " <br />1->"':; <br />...-.', <br />;'~5::' <br /> <br />Surface-Water Diversions and Consumptive Uses <br /> <br />.. <br />'.;~~"" <br /> <br />~~j <br /> <br />.....';~-:. <br /> <br />1;~~ <br /> <br />Water rights and surface-water diversions were inventoried under the auspices <br />of the State Engineer's Offices of Colorado (Knudsen and Danielson, 1977) and <br />Wyoming. That inventory and a related analysis (Gray and others, 1977; Udis and <br />others, 1977) have indicated that more than 90 percent of water withdrawals and <br />96 percent of consumptive use of water in northwestern Colorado in 1976 could be <br />attributed to agriculture--primarily for irrigation. <br /> <br />~}~ <br /> <br />Numerous smal,l irrigation diversions within the basin principally are used to <br />deliver water to hay and wheat fields and to pastureland (Colorado Water Conserva- <br />tion Board and U.s. Department of Agriculture, 1969). The actual amounts of water <br />diverted through these small diversions, although recorded by the State Engineer's <br />Office during intermittent onsite visitations, are not accurately known. However, <br />data for the Gibraltar Canal, a large diversion canal located on the Yampa River <br />near Hayden, Colo. (fig. 1), were available and were included in.the basinwide- <br />reservoir analyses. <br /> <br />~.::~l~i: <br /> <br />Reservoir Geometry <br /> <br />':..";i-i' <br />.;.:.:, <br />~t:1 <br />-.:..<. <br />:t;'~j <br />'~,;;'", ;: <br />","';.. <br />[si.r; <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />~$."~'/ <br />~~:~ <br />~i <br /> <br />f,"*'~ <br />t~i3 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />?~~~;j~~' <br /> <br />Two proposed transmountai.n diversion projects that are in,tended to,divert <br />water from the Yampa River basin to another area were included in the reservoir <br />analyses (fig. 1). These proposed transmountain diversions are an expansion of the <br />existing Hog Park project that diverts water from tributaries of the Little Snake <br />River to the Cheyenne, Wyo., metropolitan area (Banner & Associates, Inc., 1976; <br />U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1981) and the Vidler (Sheephorn) project for' di- <br />verting water from tributaries of the Yampa River upstream from Steamboat Springs <br />to the Denver, Colo., metropol itan area (Robert Moreland, Vidler Tunnel Corp., <br />wr i tten commun., 1977). <br /> <br />Prel iminary reservoir-geometry data for 17 major proposed reservoirs were <br />obtained from Herbert Dishl.ip (U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, written commun., 1977). <br />These reservoirs represent 97 percent of the proposed reservoir volume in the ba- <br />s in (18 projects, 35 reservoi rs). The primary data obtained included water-surface <br />elevation versus surface area and storage capacity. Prel iminary estimates of the <br />active storage volumes of each reservoir also were obtained from Herbert Dishlip <br />(U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, written commun., 1977). Storage volumes are deter- <br />mined by computing the differences between the volumes of the conservation pool <br />(usable part of the reservoir storage) and dead storage (nonusable reservoir <br />storage below outlets). Data for outlet,elevations generally were not available, <br />so estimates were made from dead-storage or conservation-pool elevations. No data <br />were available for the amount of active reservoir storage to be allotted to given <br />downstream needs. <br /> <br />~;,;:::/ <br /> <br />~ ~:.:;;:. <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br /> <br />Reservoir Configurations <br /> <br />Seventeen proposed reservoirs involving 10 projects were considered for the <br />study analysis and are listed in table 3; their locations are shown in figure 1. <br />The four alternative configurations or options of reservoir development considered <br />in this study are also summarized in table 3. <br /> <br />..t, ,oC, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.