My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05115
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05115
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:02 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:52:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.766
Description
Gunnison River General
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
8/12/1987
Author
DOI-BLM
Title
Gunnison Basin and the American Flats-Silverton Wilderness - Final Environmental Impact Statement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
271
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />D'JIHn <br /> <br />Purpose and Need <br /> <br />management practices of llvestock <br />operators in the five WSAs would be <br />more closely regul ated, they woul d <br />continue as they did prior to <br />wilderness designation subject to <br />reasonable controls. The lmpact of <br />wilderness designation on l1vestock <br />operations as a result of curtallment <br />of planned range developments is not <br />considered an issue since no range <br />developments exist nor are any planned. <br /> <br />2. Effects on Air Qualfty <br />Classification - Concerns were raised <br />regarding the i nteractf on between <br />wll derness designation and air quality <br />classification. The wilderness <br />management policy states that BLM will <br />manage all wllderness areas to comply <br />wfth the existing air quality <br />classification for that specffic area. <br />50 wilderness deslgnatlon or non- <br />designation would not cause the air <br />qualfty classlflcation to change. <br />Therefore. this Issue was dropped from <br />further analysis ln the EIS. <br /> <br />3. Effects on CuI tural Resources <br />Generally, wllderness designation ls <br />not adverse to cuI tural resources <br />because they w1l1 generally beneff t <br />from an area being deslgnated as <br />wllderness. Except for val1d exlsting <br />rights, such designation legally <br />precl udes development, land <br />disturbances, motorized use, and other <br />damaglng or lntrusive human effects. <br />Most wil derness users tend to be <br />sens Iti ve to thei r envi ronment and thus <br />are far less lfkely to "pothunt" than <br />others. Wl1 derness areas totally <br />ellmi nate access by road and thus <br />ellminate the use of vehicles or heavy <br />equipment for vandalism purposes. A <br />1979 study (N1ckens, et al.. 1979) has <br />conflrmed that cultural sites more than <br />one half a mlle from a road are much <br />less vandal ized than those sites near a <br />roadway. <br /> <br />Inventory procedure fs well-establfshed <br />and ls done whenever surface <br />dlsturbance occurs in a non-inventoried <br />area. Mitigation for site loss or <br />damage is normally done when a site <br />qual1fies for inclusion in the National <br />Register of Historic Places. This is <br />required by law. Mltfgation can range <br />from site excavation and analysis to <br />site avoidance through project <br />redeslgn. If an area is not designated <br />wl1 derness. It may be opened to <br />development such as 011 and gas, roads, <br />tlmber sales. and other surface <br />dlsturbing actlvities. Such <br />dlsturbance may cause destruction to <br />slgnlficant cultural resources and can <br />open up regions without previous <br />access. Increased access can provide <br />vandals and "pothunters" easy ablli ty <br />to loot and the damage to cultural <br />resources can increase greatly. It <br />should be noted, however. that most all <br />development on the publfc lands <br />requlres inventory and mitlgation for <br />cultural resources, thus provlding <br />legal protection which occurs whether <br />an area is deslgnated as wilderness or <br />not. <br /> <br />At the time a wl1derness management <br />plan ls developed, procedures for the <br />identlflcatfon and protection of <br />cultural resources wlll be considered <br />as part of that process. This w1l1 <br />inlcude lnventory, when appropriate, <br />mlttgatfon as needed and consultation <br />with the State Historic Preservation <br />Offtcer as requlred uner 36 CFR 800.4. <br />At present, no hlstorlc properties, as <br />defined in 36 CFR Part 60 (National <br />Regfster of Historic Places), are known <br />to exl st within the wl1 derness study <br />areas lncluded in this document. In <br />those cases where significant cultural <br />val ues are known to exist, or that are <br />suspected to be present. the <br />legislation that is developed must <br />address access. and sci entlftc or <br />educational uses. that may be requlred. <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.