Laserfiche WebLink
<br />!:) <br />,~) <br />..-I <br />~ <br /> <br />;,~' <br /> <br />C) <br /> <br />Table No. <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />16 Combined Effect of Salt Load Reductions from Irrigated <br />Land and Grazed Range and Woodlands ____.._______nnnu___ 44 <br /> <br />17 EconomIc Comparison of the Alternative Plans -------------- 46 <br /> <br />18 Seasonal I rrigation Water Budget After Del ivery to the <br />Farms ----------------------------------------------------- 48 <br /> <br />19 Annual Salt Pickup and Potential Reduction Attributed <br />to On-Farm Irrigation ------------------------------------- 50 <br /> <br />20 Amounts of Sediment and Salt Contributed Annually to <br />the Colorado River by Erosion in the Grand Valley Unit 52 <br /> <br />21 Potential Salt Load Reduction from Grazed Range Sites <br />& Woodland ------------------------------------------------ 53 <br /> <br />22 Typical Display of Elements of Management and Cost of <br />Implementation Determined by Computer Analysis for each <br />Field ----------------------------------------------------- 58 <br /> <br />23 Selected Plan - Irrigated Land ---------------------------- 60 <br /> <br /> <br />24 Selected Plan - Non-Irrigated Land ------------------------ 61 <br /> <br />25 Annual Level of Funding at 75 Percent Federal Assistance <br />for Installation of Systems ------------------------------- 66 <br /> <br />ili <br />