Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Jf <br /> <br />UNRESOLVED ISSUES FROM STATE POSITION PAPERS' <br /> <br />5/24174 <br />DO <br /> <br />STATE <br /> <br />ISSUE <br /> <br />SUB-ISSUE <br /> <br />Colorado <br /> <br />Iowa <br /> <br />Average annual streamflow of the Missouri <br />River at Sioux City, Iowa, must be 21.2 <br />million A.F. <br /> <br />Kan s a s <br /> <br />Lacking of statutory evidence giving the <br />Federal agencies autho~'ity to at'bitrarily <br />initiate a change in the so-called PSMGP <br />or the 1'1issouri Basin Program. <br /> <br />Minnesota <br /> <br />Not stated. <br /> <br />Mi ssouri <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Montana <br /> <br />Nebraska <br /> <br />Bureau of Reclamation authority to make <br />the proposed sales of l'later. <br /> <br />North Dakota <br /> <br />Not stated. <br /> <br />South Dakota <br /> <br />Hater supplies as specified in Sec. l(b) <br />(1944 Flood Control Act) were left to <br />the control of the states. <br /> <br />Hyoming <br /> <br />Not sta ted. <br /> <br />Equitable distribution <br />of benefits accruing <br />from the sale of the <br />water. <br /> <br />Sale of water would <br />require reauthorization, <br />deauthorization, and <br />reallocation of costs. <br /> <br />Ilot stated. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Additional time for a <br />more thorough analysis <br />and study is required. <br /> <br />Proposed sales would <br />involve a major opera- <br />tional change in the <br />reservoir system re- <br />quiring reauthorization. <br /> <br />Not stated. <br /> <br />Pricing and marketing <br />policies. <br /> <br />Nc.t stated. <br />