Laserfiche WebLink
<br />l' <br />.... <br />OC' <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />The tenn "Lower Basin" means those <br />parts of the States of Arizona, Calilomia, <br />Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah within <br />and from which waters naturally drain <br />into the Colorado River system below <br />Lees Fen)', and all parts of these States <br />that are not pan of the river's drainage <br />system, but which may benefit from <br />waters diverted from the system below <br />Lees Fen)', <br />The Colorado River Compact appor- <br />tioned from the Colorado River system in <br />perpetuity to the Upper Basin and to the <br />Lower Basin, respectively, the exclusive, <br />beneficial consumptive use of 7,500,000 <br />acre-feet of waler per year. In addition, <br />the compact gave the Lower Basin the <br />light to increase its anllllal beneficial <br />consumptive llse of water by 1,000,000 <br />acrc- feet. <br />The Colorado River Compact did not <br />apportion water to any State. This was <br />left to the States in each Basin to resolve <br />among themselves. On October 11, 1948, <br />the Upper Basin States entered into the <br />Upper Colorado River Basin Compact, <br />which states how much of the Upper <br />Basin's 7,500,000 acre-foot annual allot- <br />ment each State is entitled to use. (see pg. <br />49 lor States and amounts,) <br />Although the Boulder Canyon Project <br />Act authorized the States of Arizona, <br />California, and Nevada to enter into an <br />agreement appol1ioning the Lower Basin <br />entitlement, the States could not reach an <br />agreement. In a suit tiled before the U.S. <br />Supreme Court in 1952, Arizona asked <br />for a detemlination of how the river's <br />water should be divided among the three <br />States. During the next 8 years, a Special <br />Master appointed by the Court heard <br />testimony from the States and other in- <br />terested parties. He presented his recom- <br />mendations to the Court in 1960. In Oc- <br />tober Term 1962, the COUI1 ruled that of <br />the first 7,500,000 acre-feet of mainstem <br />water delivered to the Lower Basin, <br />California was entitled to 4.400,000 acre- <br />feet; Arizona 2,ROO,Ooo acre-feet; and <br />Nevada 300,000 acre-feel. <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br /> <br />The Boulder Canyon Project Act <br />On Deccmber 21, 1928, the Boulder <br />Canyon Project Act became law. As pass- <br />ed, the Act: <br />- approved the Colorado River <br />Compact; <br />- provided that in the event only six <br />States should ratify the compact, it <br />would become effective as a six-State <br />compact; and that California should <br />agree to limit its use of water for the <br />benefit of the other six States; <br />~ authorized construction of a dam at <br />Black Canyon or Boulder Canyon; <br />- authorized construction of the All- <br />American Canal system connecting the <br /> <br />Bureau of Reclamation signs the contract with <br />Six Companies, Inc., for the constrnction of Hoover <br />Dam, powe/plant. and appurtenant works. The <br />S48,890, 995.50 contract was the largest construction <br />contract let by the United States Government lip <br />to that time. <br /> <br />Imperial and Coachella Valleys with <br />the Colorado River; and <br />- authorized $165 million for construction <br />of the entire projecL <br />Further, the Act stated that the dam <br />authorized for construction would have <br />the following purposes: <br />- flood control; <br />- improvement of navigation and regula- <br />tion of the Colorado River; <br />- storage and delivel)' of Colorado <br />River waters for reclamation of public <br />lands and other beneficial uses ex- <br />clusively within the United States; and <br />