Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The Selected Plan will have an adverse effect on Bone Draw. As irrigation <br />water management practices are installed and less water reaches the <br />underground aquifer, water levels in Bone Draw will diminish. This, in <br />turn, will reduce the saline seep flows. Eventually, flows in Bone Draw <br />will change from perennial to intermittent and eliminate fish spawning <br />areas. There are no program authorities available to SCS which will <br />allow replacing Bone Draw flows with water of similar existing quality. <br />However, the flows in Bone Draw can be replaced. The costs appear to be <br />prohibitively high, and it is doubtful any agency will expend these <br />funds for such a small return. <br /> <br />Fisheries habitat is expected to improve in the Big Sandy and Eden <br />Reservoirs if water storage and irrigation drawdowns are coordinated to <br />maximize waterfowl and fisheries habitat in the Big Sandy River. As <br />previously stated, coordination between the Irrigation and Drainage <br />District, WGFD, and the Wyoming State Engineer will be needed. <br /> <br />The release schedule will improve fish habitat from the Big Sandy <br />Reservoir to Gasson Bridge. Big Sandy Reservoir water will be <br />discharged from a bottom outlet resulting in lower water temperatures in <br />the river. In addition, TDS concentrations will be significantly <br />lowered. Some improvement in water quality will also occur from Gasson <br />Bridge to the mouth of the Big Sandy River, although to a lesser degree <br />than upstream. Projections of specific water quality levels as a result <br />of this action are not available. <br /> <br />Endangered Species <br /> <br />In August 1986, the SCS sent a Biological Assessment for the Selected <br />Plan to the USFWS's Endangered Species office in Helena, Montana, to <br />support the SCS's "no effect" determination. <br /> <br />On November 10, 1986, based on USFWS's determination, the SCS requested <br />Section 7 Formal Consultation. The SCS transmitted additional <br />information provided by the WGFD and BLM for the Biological Assessment. <br />The USFWS responded on January 23, 1987, as follows: <br /> <br />It is the FWS biological opinion that the Big Sandy River <br />Salinity Control Project will not jeopardize the continued <br />existence of the whooping crane, black-footed ferret, Colorado <br />squawfish, or humpback chub. The FWS previously concurred <br />with your determination that the project would not affect the <br />bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) or the peregrine falcon <br />(Falco peregrinus). <br /> <br />Our no-jeopardy opinion for whooping crane is based upon SCS's <br />commitment to continue to work with WGFD to maintain and <br />enhance wetland habitats and to design and locate powerlines <br />and fences to minimize potential collision and/or <br />electrocution hazards to cranes. <br /> <br />l~ : I 1 l' '.' f) <br />.J.. . I." <br /> <br />Our no-jeopardy opinion on ferrets is based upon SCS's <br />commitment to conduct black-footed ferret surveys for direct <br /> <br />4-20 <br /> <br />'\j <br />~ <br /> <br />;.'~<J <br />:~; <br />?h' <br />~J <br /> <br />:!'I':'l <br />t~ <br />~ <br /> <br />JJj <br />iil <br /> <br />',," <br />i",""; <br />i.O< <br />,~ <br /> <br />"""'" <br /> <br />~';J. <br /> <br />,,~- I <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />:~~ ' <br /> <br />>i/.,~' <br /> <br />L",i!i <br /> <br />r~ <br /> <br />ii.,,; <br /> <br />\~: <br /> <br />1"\' <br /> <br />,~'-~: <br /> <br />-\"<, <br />L~ <br />