Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" "~; <br /> <br />The sandy loam soils are suitable for irrigation with some limitations. <br />The coarse texture results in low waterholding capacity and moderately <br />rapid to rapid permeability, This generally leads to low irrigation <br />efficiencies under flood irrigation systems. The topography is nearly <br />level to gently sloping with some microrelief. Land smoothing and <br />leveling of this microrelief to facilitate more even distribution of <br />water under border dike or contour ditch irrigation methods removes the <br />topsoil from high spots and adds it to low areas. This increases soil <br />variability as to waterholding capacity and productivity. <br /> <br />....:.{ <br /> <br />;,::1 <br />< - <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br />~> _';:l <br /> <br />-"'", <br /> <br /><.. <br /> <br />The low waterhoJding capacity and moderately rapid to rapid permeability <br />of the soils results in much of the water from the canals, ditches, and <br />that applied to the field being lost through deep percolation. This <br />waste water is retained or held up as a perched water table by the <br />underlying shale. Buildup of a water table above the shale has created <br />wet soils conditions generally with accompanying salinity and alkalinity. <br />Drainage ditches have been installed to drain some areas, but other <br />areas would benefit if drainage were improved or deep percolation <br />reduced. <br /> <br />:"'_1 <br /> <br />~-'1 <br />.,..~ <br /> <br />Water erosion on the irrigated lands is generally not a problem as the <br />topography is nearly level to gently sloping, except for gullies <br />developing from waste water runoff and from water breaking out of <br />ditches. Wind erosion is a problem with a loamy fine sand, loamy sand, <br />or fine sand surface if these soils are left unprotected during the <br />critical wind erosion periods. <br /> <br />~}1 <br /> <br />;~:L, <br /> <br />-'.'~ <br /> <br />Fish and Wildlife Resources <br /> <br />Although limited by seasonal low flows, lack of habitat, and poor water <br />quality, the Big Sandy River from the Big Sandy Reservoir to the <br />confluence of the Green River does support a relatively diverse fishery <br />dominated by nongame species. The river supports substantial spawning <br />and adult habitat for several nongame species including flannelmouth, <br />bluehead, and white sucker; roundtail and Utah chub; redside shiner; <br />speckled dace; mottled sculpin; and fathead minnow. <br /> <br />;11; <br />.;.., <br /> <br />The total number and percent composition of trout species appears to <br />vary on a seasonal basis. However, according to the WGFD, the overall <br />standing crop seems to remain relatively constant, averaging 8.3 lb/acre <br />of trout. On the other hand, the productivity in the section of the <br />river from the Gasson Bridge to its confluence with the Green River <br />appears to be very poor at 0.84 lb/acre. It appears that the primary <br />function of this reach of the river to the trout fishery is as a <br />corridor for immigration and emigration from the Green River, probably <br />to the Big Bend-Bone Draw area. <br /> <br />'iIi <br /> <br />Streamside vegetation of the Big Sandy River consists primarily of <br />grasses, sedges, and sagebrush. The development of good riparian <br />vegetation such as willow, wild rose, and cottonwoods is limited by <br />overgrazing, saline ground water, and bank instability. The river <br />bottom is composed primarily of sand and silt with some shale and <br />sandstone outcroppings. <br /> <br />2-14 <br /> <br />, 1'-'''' <br />"'I " <br />,:" .l4... <br /> <br />,,' <br />~ <br />~~ <br />