My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05088
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05088
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:16:53 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:51:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8221.112.J
Description
Central Arizona Project
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
10/1/1993
Title
Governor's Central Arizona Project Advisory Committee: Final Report and Recommendations
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br />to <br />.,"" <br />.-I <br />C"t'') <br /> <br />C..::. <br />~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />. <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />GOVERNOR'S CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT ADVISORY COMMITTEE <br /> <br />Water Marketina Issues <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CAWCD and DWR should develop a program for intrastate marketing of CAP water. <br />The program should enable the operation of the CAP to benefit financially from such <br />arrangements by implementing a fee structure for such transfers. Additional <br />benefits could also be realized by increased utilization if parties not using CAP water <br />transferred their contracts to those who will. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />DWR should study the feasibility of arrangements in which California and Nevada <br />take advantage of unused entitlement and canal capacity to store water in Arizona <br />in exchange for the right to increased Colorado River diversions in the future. The <br />cost for such water banking should be borne in full by the contracting state. This <br />type of program could be beneficial to Arizona because it would provide a long-term <br />source of water to a neighboring state without reducing Arizona's Colorado River <br />entitlement and would provide additional utilization of the Project thereby reducing <br />costs for Arizona contractors and subcontractors. <br /> <br />Indian Issues <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Becaus :t is in the best interest of the Indian communities, the federal government <br />and the state, the state should request that the federal government make <br />settlem 'It of outstanding Indian water rights claims in Arizona a priority. <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'. <br />The sta ~ should offer its assistance in any way that is appropriate to encourage <br />" <br />complet ;',n of water rights settlement negotiations among the Indians, federal and <br />local go '!rnments and other entities. In particular. the state should encourage the <br />federal 'overnment to make Indian settlements apriority, especially those <br />settlem ts which have been completed between the Indians and local entities. <br /> <br />FINAL REPORT A 10 RECOMMENDA TlONS <br /> <br />29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.