My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05088
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05088
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:16:53 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:51:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8221.112.J
Description
Central Arizona Project
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
10/1/1993
Title
Governor's Central Arizona Project Advisory Committee: Final Report and Recommendations
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br />..... <br />~ <br />,,., <br /> <br />o <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />i <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />GOVERNOR'S CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT ADVISORY COMMITTEE <br /> <br />Policv Issue: To what extent is the original purpose of the CAP as a replacement supply <br />for irrigation still justified? <br /> <br />Irrigated agriculture is the largest user of groundwater in the Central Arizona <br />Project service area. One of the Project's primary purposes was to supply <br />water to the agricultural sector. Since no new land is allowed to be put into <br />agricultural production using either groundwater or CAP water, CAP water <br />is intended to be a substitute or a "rescue" supply for agriculture, which will <br />allow it to be a sustainable industry in our state. If agriculture cannot utilize <br />CAP water because the cost is too high, it will remain on groundwater. This <br />will eventually deplete the state's groundwater supplies within central and <br />southern Arizona. <br /> <br />Kev Considerations: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Financial assistance to agricultural irrigation districts through lower CAP costs and <br />restructured distribution system debt should be provided but only to the extent <br />there are benefits to the state, including the state's environment, and CAWCD's <br />other customers. <br /> <br />Policv Issue: In considering a reformatted CAP, should proposals to allocate and use CAP <br />water for environmental enhancement (not mitigation) purposes be considered? <br /> <br />Fish and wildlife and recreational benefits are authorized purposes of the <br />CAP. However, no specific enhancement features were constructed nor <br />were any specific water allocations made for these purposes. Mitigation of <br />environmental impacts from both construction and project operation is <br />required and is funded as a part of the Project. Additional opportunities may <br />exist to use CAP water to create enhancement features if water allocations <br />are made available. <br /> <br />Kev Considerations: <br /> <br />· Consideration should be given to allocating some amount of CAP water for <br />environmental purposes and to establishing an environmental trust fund dedicated <br /> <br />FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDA TIONS <br /> <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.