My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05088
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05088
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:16:53 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:51:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8221.112.J
Description
Central Arizona Project
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
10/1/1993
Title
Governor's Central Arizona Project Advisory Committee: Final Report and Recommendations
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />'J <br /> <br />.-l <br />(Ij <br />(::-' <br />jJ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />GOVERNOR'S CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT ADVISORY COMMITTEE <br /> <br />Issues, Problems, and Concerns * * * Solution Elements -- Draft report, April 16, 1 993, <br />prepared by ADWR <br /> <br />Part 1 of this report documents the results of information gained from interviews <br />and questionnaires completed by over fifty-six agencies, subcontractors, Indian <br />communities, and other interested parties. ADWR staff conducted these interviews in <br />February and March of 1993. After the responses were analyzed, the issues, problems, <br />and concerns were grouped into five issue areas. The issue areas are: <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />What measures are necessary to ensure that Arizona's entitlement to Colorado <br />River Water is adequate? <br />What issues affect CAP water utilization? <br />How will the allocations to individual subcontractors affect Indian water rights <br />settlements? <br />How can the cost of CAP water be fairly distributed? <br />What are the opportunities to use the CAP for environmental, recreational, or fish <br />and wildlife benefits? <br /> <br />2. <br />3. <br /> <br />4. <br />5. <br /> <br />The responses within each issue area often differed depending on the type of <br />subcontractor or interested party that was interviewed. Generally, those responding fell <br />into one of the following categories: 1) large municipalities; 2) smaller cities, private water <br />companies and industries; 3) irrigation districts; 4) Indian Tribes and communities; 5) <br />agencies responsible for water supply planning; and, 6) citizens concerned about <br />environmental issues. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I <br />!e <br />I <br /> <br />Part 2 of this report provides information regarding various solution elements to <br />problem areas associated with the Central Arizona Project. Eleven problem areas are <br />described. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Solution elements are building blocks that lead to the development of alternative <br />plans. This section of the report identifies and provides a brief concept description of <br />those elements and identifies necessary implementation actions. Some elements provide <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDA TIONS <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.