Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />~ <br />C",) <br />c <br />~, <br /> <br />.c <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I <br />;. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I. <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />GOVERNOR'S CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT ADVISORY COMMITTEE <br /> <br />Interagency Study Team and Steering Committee <br /> <br />The Interagency Study Team was composed of staff from ADWR, CAWCD, and <br />USSR. The team was composed of a variety of technical disciplines including engineers, <br />lawyers, hydrologists, economists, planners, and data processing specialists. The Study <br />Team prepared a number of reports and discussion papers which provided background <br />information for the Advisory Committee. <br /> <br />The Steering Committee, comprised of representatives from the three agencies, was <br />responsible for the overall management of the study. The Steering Committee worked <br />closely with Co-chairman Mark DeMichele in preparation of meeting agendas, <br />presentations, and logistics. The Steering Committee was responsible for ensuring that <br />public input was reflected in the information which was submitted to the Advisory <br />Committee, and that the reports or other work products were produced on schedule. <br /> <br />Public Involvement Group <br /> <br />The Public Involvement Group was not a formal committee, but rather an ad hoc <br />group of anyone who wished to participate. The meetings of this group were well <br />attended and reflected participation by a wide range of potentially affected interests. The <br />purpose of the Public Involvement Group was to review studies performed by the <br />Interagency Study Team as they were being produced so input could be received <br />concerning assumptions and technical information. The Public Involvement Group also <br />was used to help in the identification of issues and in developing concepts for alternative <br />solutions. After the Working Groups were organized, the Public Involvement Group <br />participants were invited to attend and participate in those meetings. <br /> <br />Indian Involvement Group <br /> <br />A second public involvement effort involved meetings with representatives of <br />interested Indian communities. Since the Indian communities hold major water service <br />contracts with the federal government for CAP water supplies, it was critical to obtain <br /> <br />FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDA TIONS <br /> <br />7 <br />