Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-, <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />, ,,~ <br />~~~, :~) <br /> <br />^'i <br /> <br />o <br />~~ <br />c. <br />,~ <br />r. <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />This ~mount of pm,er is based upon pm,er service to six main <br />canal plmlping pl~nts aggreg~ting over 1,200 feet of head, one <br />pumping plant on the Salt-Gila aqueduct of about 8S-foot head, <br />and four pumping plants on the Tucson Aqueducts totaling over <br />1,200 feet of head. Exact locations of ~tl pumptqg sites and <br />corresponding lifts have not yet been determined. <br /> <br />Contractual Arrangements <br /> <br />'" <br /> <br />Background. Negotiations looking toward contractual arrangements <br />for the purchase of entitlement to electric power and transmission <br />capacity in non-Federal facilities were initiated in June 1968. <br />Public and private utilities in the Southwest were invited to par- <br />ticipate, and a steering committee was formed consisting of a <br />iepresentative from each interested utility and the Bureau of <br />Reclamation. The initial non-Federal parties were: San Diego <br />Gas and Electric Company; Southern California Edison Company; <br />Los Angeles Department of Water and Power; Nevada Power Company; <br />Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District; <br />Arizona Public Service Company; Tucson Gas and Electric Company; <br />El Paso Electric Company; and Public Service Company of New Mexico. <br />While others did attend the June meeting, the above group con- <br />stituted the core of those interested. <br /> <br />The steering committee appointed several task forces to study various <br />facets of the overall problem. These task forces covered the problems <br />involved in the construction and operation of the power generation <br />and transmission facilities, including design, costs, legal and tax <br />considerations, coal leases and other property agreements, socio- <br />economic aspects, loads, and resources. <br /> <br />In February 1969 the El Paso Electric Company and the Public Service <br />Company of New Mexico decided not to participate in the joint project. <br />This decision necessitated modification of the initially contemplated <br />development. Negotiations continued. <br /> <br />In May 1969 the San Diego Gas and Electric Company and the Southern <br />California Edison Company decided that they did not desire to <br />participate in the joint effort, which at that time contemplated <br />two powerplants, one near Page, Arizona (Navajo), and one near <br />Farmington, New Mexico (Four Corners), with six 820-mw units and a <br />total electric power capacity of 4,920 mw. The Southern California <br />Edison Company will, however, be involved as a purchaser of a major <br />portion of United States entitlement to generation and transmission <br />prior to need for Central Arizona Project pumping. This decision <br /> <br />3 <br />