Laserfiche WebLink
<br />select areas for early study. As a result of these investigations, <br />Title II of Public Law 93-320 authorized the Secretary of the Interior <br />to construct as the initial stage of the CRWQIP: the Paradox Valley Unit <br />and the Grand Valley Unit, Colorado; the Crystal Geyser Unit, Utah; and <br />the Las Vegas Wash Unit, Nevada. This section presents a brief description <br />and summary of the status of investigations and construction for each of <br />the projects authorized for construction. <br /> <br />Paradox Valley Unit, Colorado <br /> <br />Paradox Valley, a collapsed salt anticline, is a northwest-southeast <br />trending valley 3 to 5 miles wide located in an arid area of southwestern <br />Co 1 or ado. <br /> <br />Geologic investigations in the Colorado Plateau have established the <br />existence of a series of five major northwest-southeast trending salt anti- <br />clines (elongated swells) about 100 miles long. The LaSal Mountains are <br />perched over the center of the anticline region. Paradox Valley lies along <br />the axis of one of these salt anticlines and was formed from erosion of <br />faulted and uplifted sandstone and shale formations from above a residual <br />gypsum cap overlying about 14,000 feet of pure salt and salt-rich shale. <br />The Dolores River remained in its ancient streambed as the uplift and <br />erosion of the valley developed. West Paradox Creek originates in the <br />LaSal Mountains and flows southeastward through the northwestern half of <br />Paradox Valley to the Dolores River. East Paradox Creek, an intermittent <br />stream, drains the southeastern half of Paradox Valley before flowing into <br />the Dolores River. <br /> <br />The salinity contribution from the Paradox Valley through the Dolores River <br />was established to be 205,000 tons of salt per year. Analysis of 5 years <br />of streamflow and water qual ity records modified the previous estimate. <br />The brine emerges in the Dolores River at a concentration of approximately <br />260,000 mg/L of total dissolved solids and at a rate varying from 0.2 to <br />2 ft3/s. <br /> <br />In 1978, a DPR (Definite Plant Report) and an Environmental Impact State- <br />ment were completed recommending a construction plan. The'documents were <br />officially approved in 1979. The plan involved pumping brine from wells <br />paralleling the Dolores River adjacent to brine inflow areas and disposing <br />of it in a large evaporation pond in Dry Creek Basin. With this plan, <br />an anticipated 180,000 tons of salt per year would be removed from the <br />Colorado River resulting in a decrease in salinity of 18.2 mg/L at Imperial <br />Dam. <br /> <br />Toxic and corrosive H2S (hydrogen sulfide) gas associ ated with the brine <br />must be removed for surface disposal. Through pilot plant studies, <br />Reclamation staff members tested several methods of H2S removal. <br /> <br />Before installing permanent facilities, a brine inflow control verification <br />program was initiated. A series of 18 production wells and 100 monitoring <br />wells were installed, along with a temporary holding pond and 3 miles of <br /> <br />40 <br />