Laserfiche WebLink
<br />through 1978 historical flows modified to reflect present depletions) as <br />had previous similar progress reports. Calculations were done by hand. <br /> <br />w <br />.... <br />o <br />.",. <br /> <br />The CRSS (Colorado River Simulation System) computer model was also used <br />for future water Quality projections. A description of the model is given <br />in Part X. Speci al Studies. Progress Report No. 10. along with the projec- <br />tions. The model produces better water quality predictions because of <br />its ability to more accurately describe the river basin and its greater <br />degree of flexibility. Pro~r-ess Report No. 11 and all future progress <br />reports wi 11 shaw only the CR S resul ts. Figure 13 shows the various CRSS <br />projections presented in Progress Re~ort No. 11 to be released in January <br />1983 [2]. Figure 14 shows the CR S projections with CRWQIP projects <br />implemented. <br /> <br />The CRSS flow and salinity projections in Progress Report No. 10 are <br />considered pr-el iminary for several reasons. The hydrologlc data base for <br />the computer model was not completed beyond 1974. The intent was to use a <br />data base from 1906 to 1978. Also, time did not allow thorough checking of <br />the projections against the input data to ensure proper operation of the <br />model. The projections using "present modified method" based on annual <br />averages remain the best estimate at the time Pro~ress Report No. 10 was <br />published. However. the work on the data base has Slnce been completed and <br />an updated revision is available for future model operations. including <br />Proqress Report No. 11. <br /> <br />Projections made using CRSS will differ from those previously made in three <br />significant ways: <br /> <br />1. The model dynamically routes water and salt through the system usinq <br />a monthly time step. more accurately reflecting the time lags, changes <br />in reservoir storage. and related buffering of salinity as it travels <br />through the system. Previous techniques applied projected annual <br />changes in depletion and salt loading to a water and salt load accountw <br />ing wh ich assumed that the system was at a steady state of average <br />conditions for that point in time. <br /> <br />2. The data base used in CRSS utilizes the period beginning in 1906, <br />whi le previous analyses of future sal inily have been based upon the <br />period beginning 1n 1941. This change places the analyses of salinity <br />in the same context as water supply analyses conducted by the Department <br />of the Interior. <br /> <br />Traditionally, there has been some disagreement regarding the use of <br />water supply records from the first quarter of this century to determine <br />firm water supply. During hearings on the Colorado River Basin Project <br />Act (Public law 90-537) in the middle 1960's, experts testified that, <br />although the river has exhibited a long-term annual flow of 15 million <br />acre-feet. the safe usable volume needs to be based upon a lesser runoff <br />to r-eflect the impact of drought periods. Therefore. the water supply <br />studies prepar-ed by the Department of the Interior utilize: <br /> <br />31 <br />